Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
JWWFX vs RNPAX
JWWFX vs RNPAX Comparison
Open Charts JWWFX vs RNPAX
JWWFX vs RNPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
JWWFX vs. RNPAX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JWWFX is a Buy and RNPAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPAX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. JWWFX (4.71B). JWWFX pays higher dividends than RNPAX: JWWFX (0.51) vs RNPAX (0.37). JWWFX was incepted earlier than RNPAX: JWWFX (17 years) vs RNPAX (24 years). RNPAX (1.49) is less costly to investors than JWWFX (0.82). JWWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. RNPAX (23.00). RNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than JWWFX: RNPAX (250) vs JWWFX (2500). JWWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.42 vs. RNPAX (6.13). JWWFX return over 5 years is better than : 24.32 vs. RNPAX (8.01).
| JWWFX | RNPAX | JWWFX / RNPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 1.49 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 1.49 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.527 | 4.905 | 174% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.71B | 170B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.37 | 139% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.42 | 6.13 | 137% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.91 | 29.92 | 150% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.32 | 8.01 | 304% |
| Returns for 10 years | 130.78 | 95.18 | 137% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement