It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
KALU’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNHYKF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
KALU’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NHYKF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
KALU (@Aluminum) experienced а -5.12% price change this week, while NHYKF (@Aluminum) price change was -5.36% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Aluminum industry was -6.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -11.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.93%.
KALU is expected to report earnings on Feb 20, 2025.
Aluminum is widely used in the industries like construction, packaging and automotive sector. The segment has seen increased demand for the lightweight variety in automobiles in improving fuel efficiency. The U.S. aluminum industry generates nearly $71 billion a year in direct economic impact (according to The Aluminum Association). Arconic, Inc, Alcoa Corp and Kaiser Aluminum Corporation are major aluminum companies in the U.S.
KALU | NHYKF | KALU / NHYKF | |
Capitalization | 1.21B | 11.3B | 11% |
EBITDA | 220M | 15.4B | 1% |
Gain YTD | 9.925 | -17.513 | -57% |
P/E Ratio | 25.92 | 89.31 | 29% |
Revenue | 2.98B | 195B | 2% |
Total Cash | 45.7M | 24.1B | 0% |
Total Debt | 1.08B | 37.8B | 3% |
KALU | NHYKF | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 54 | 67 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 7 Undervalued | 8 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 68 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 78 | 88 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 55 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 98 | 6 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 46 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
KALU's Valuation (7) in the Aluminum industry is in the same range as NHYKF (8) in the null industry. This means that KALU’s stock grew similarly to NHYKF’s over the last 12 months.
NHYKF's Profit vs Risk Rating (68) in the null industry is in the same range as KALU (100) in the Aluminum industry. This means that NHYKF’s stock grew similarly to KALU’s over the last 12 months.
KALU's SMR Rating (78) in the Aluminum industry is in the same range as NHYKF (88) in the null industry. This means that KALU’s stock grew similarly to NHYKF’s over the last 12 months.
KALU's Price Growth Rating (55) in the Aluminum industry is in the same range as NHYKF (62) in the null industry. This means that KALU’s stock grew similarly to NHYKF’s over the last 12 months.
NHYKF's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for KALU (98) in the Aluminum industry. This means that NHYKF’s stock grew significantly faster than KALU’s over the last 12 months.
KALU | NHYKF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago83% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% | 2 days ago74% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago74% | 2 days ago68% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago84% | 2 days ago73% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago75% | 2 days ago68% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago76% | 2 days ago68% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 24 days ago73% | 15 days ago66% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago73% | 2 days ago69% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago73% | 3 days ago74% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago68% | 2 days ago57% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KALU has been loosely correlated with AA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KALU jumps, then AA could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KALU | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
KALU | 100% | -1.49% | ||
AA - KALU | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.05% | ||
CSTM - KALU | 54% Loosely correlated | -0.91% | ||
CENX - KALU | 53% Loosely correlated | -3.92% | ||
NHYDY - KALU | 43% Loosely correlated | -1.56% | ||
NHYKF - KALU | 22% Poorly correlated | -1.49% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NHYKF has been loosely correlated with NHYDY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NHYKF jumps, then NHYDY could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NHYKF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
NHYKF | 100% | -1.49% | ||
NHYDY - NHYKF | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.56% | ||
AA - NHYKF | 41% Loosely correlated | -0.05% | ||
CENX - NHYKF | 41% Loosely correlated | -3.92% | ||
CSTM - NHYKF | 25% Poorly correlated | -0.91% | ||
KALU - NHYKF | 22% Poorly correlated | -1.49% | ||
More |