Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KCGIX vs RGEBX
KCGIX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts KCGIX vs RGEBX
Knights of Columbus Large Cap Growth I
Price$23.56
Change+$0.06 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets262.43M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$81.81
Change+$0.13 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.53B
KCGIX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KCGIX vs. RGEBX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KCGIX is a StrongBuy and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. KCGIX (262M). KCGIX pays higher dividends than RGEBX: KCGIX (0.06) vs RGEBX (0.00). KCGIX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: KCGIX (11 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). RGEBX (1.09) is less costly to investors than KCGIX (0.76). KCGIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RGEBX (25.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than KCGIX: RGEBX (250) vs KCGIX (25000). KCGIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.12 vs. RGEBX (13.34). KCGIX return over 5 years is better than : 43.29 vs. RGEBX (33.65).
| KCGIX | RGEBX | KCGIX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.09 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.09 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.512 | 14.516 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 25000 | 250 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 262M | 328B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.06 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.12 | 13.34 | 143% |
| Returns for 3 years | 76.54 | 50.24 | 152% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.29 | 33.65 | 129% |
| Returns for 10 years | 144.62 | 88.40 | 164% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement