Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KCGIX vs RGEBX
KCGIX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts KCGIX vs RGEBX
KCGIX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KCGIX vs. RGEBX commentary
Jul 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KCGIX is a Hold and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. KCGIX (330M). KCGIX pays higher dividends than RGEBX: KCGIX (0.04) vs RGEBX (0.00). KCGIX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: KCGIX (11 years) vs RGEBX (12 years). RGEBX (1.08) is less costly to investors than KCGIX (0.75). KCGIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. RGEBX (32.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than KCGIX: RGEBX (250) vs KCGIX (25000). KCGIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.56 vs. RGEBX (-0.55). KCGIX return over 5 years is better than : 37.65 vs. RGEBX (8.15).
| KCGIX | RGEBX | KCGIX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.08 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.08 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.354 | 4.396 | 236% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 25000 | 250 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 330M | 357B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.04 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.56 | -0.55 | -2,663% |
| Returns for 3 years | 71.25 | 33.31 | 214% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.65 | 8.15 | 462% |
| Returns for 10 years | 163.50 | 89.98 | 182% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement