Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KCGSX vs RGAHX
KCGSX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts KCGSX vs RGAHX
Knights of Columbus Large Cap Growth S
Price$24.35
Change+$0.18 (+0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets266.47M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$85.18
Change+$0.45 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.37B
KCGSX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KCGSX vs. RGAHX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KCGSX is a Hold and RGAHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 327B vs. KCGSX (266M). RGAHX pays higher dividends than KCGSX: RGAHX (0.44) vs KCGSX (0.00). KCGSX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: KCGSX (10 years) vs RGAHX (10 years). KCGSX (0.86) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). KCGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RGAHX (25.00). KCGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAHX: KCGSX (0) vs RGAHX (250). KCGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.09 vs. RGAHX (7.06). KCGSX return over 5 years is better than : 48.44 vs. RGAHX (34.78).
| KCGSX | RGAHX | KCGSX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.44 | 195% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.44 | 195% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.370 | 15.986 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 266M | 327B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.44 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.09 | 7.06 | 228% |
| Returns for 3 years | 94.77 | 63.22 | 150% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.44 | 34.78 | 139% |
| Returns for 10 years | 142.75 | 89.07 | 160% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement