Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KCGSX vs RGAHX
KCGSX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts KCGSX vs RGAHX
Knights of Columbus Large Cap Growth S
Price$24.24
Change-$0.10 (-0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets275.91M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$86.05
Change-$0.82 (-0.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.37B
KCGSX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KCGSX vs. RGAHX commentary
Sep 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KCGSX is a Hold and RGAHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. KCGSX (276M). RGAHX pays higher dividends than KCGSX: RGAHX (0.46) vs KCGSX (0.00). KCGSX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: KCGSX (10 years) vs RGAHX (10 years). KCGSX (0.86) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). KCGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RGAHX (25.00). KCGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAHX: KCGSX (0) vs RGAHX (250). KCGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.64 vs. RGAHX (13.06). KCGSX return over 5 years is better than : 57.90 vs. RGAHX (48.09).
| KCGSX | RGAHX | KCGSX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.44 | 195% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.44 | 195% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.188 | 17.170 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 276M | 338B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.46 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.64 | 13.06 | 166% |
| Returns for 3 years | 105.74 | 73.29 | 144% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.90 | 48.09 | 120% |
| Returns for 10 years | 169.25 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement