Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KCGSX vs RGAHX
KCGSX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts KCGSX vs RGAHX
KCGSX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KCGSX vs. RGAHX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KCGSX is a Hold and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. KCGSX (358M). RGAHX pays higher dividends than KCGSX: RGAHX (0.40) vs KCGSX (0.02). KCGSX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: KCGSX (11 years) vs RGAHX (11 years). KCGSX (0.85) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). KCGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. RGAHX (32.00). KCGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAHX: KCGSX (0) vs RGAHX (250). KCGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.95 vs. RGAHX (4.43). KCGSX return over 5 years is better than : 42.07 vs. RGAHX (16.49).
| KCGSX | RGAHX | KCGSX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.44 | 193% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.44 | 193% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.434 | 7.244 | 172% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 358M | 357B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.40 | 5% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.95 | 4.43 | 428% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.42 | 39.88 | 184% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.07 | 16.49 | 255% |
| Returns for 10 years | 168.85 | 102.84 | 164% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers