Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KCGSX vs RGEBX
KCGSX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts KCGSX vs RGEBX
Knights of Columbus Large Cap Growth S
Price$23.44
Change-$0.02 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets265.01M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$81.46
Change-$0.03 (-0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.41B
KCGSX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KCGSX vs. RGEBX commentary
Aug 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KCGSX is a Buy and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. KCGSX (265M). KCGSX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . KCGSX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: KCGSX (10 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). RGEBX (1.09) is less costly to investors than KCGSX (0.86). KCGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RGEBX (25.00). KCGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGEBX: KCGSX (0) vs RGEBX (250). KCGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.41 vs. RGEBX (16.27). KCGSX return over 5 years is better than : 51.41 vs. RGEBX (40.75).
| KCGSX | RGEBX | KCGSX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.09 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.09 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.951 | 14.026 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 265M | 329B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.41 | 16.27 | 144% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.37 | 40.38 | 162% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.41 | 40.75 | 126% |
| Returns for 10 years | 130.62 | 79.00 | 165% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement