Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KCSIX vs NAESX
KCSIX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts KCSIX vs NAESX
KCSIX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KCSIX vs. NAESX commentary
Aug 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KCSIX is a Hold and NAESX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 183B vs. KCSIX (215M). NAESX pays higher dividends than KCSIX: NAESX (1.10) vs KCSIX (0.49). KCSIX was incepted earlier than NAESX: KCSIX (11 years) vs NAESX (66 years). KCSIX (0.90) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). KCSIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. NAESX (17.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than KCSIX: NAESX (0) vs KCSIX (25000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.75 vs. KCSIX (20.78). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 42.07 vs. KCSIX (16.62).
| KCSIX | NAESX | KCSIX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.17 | 529% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.17 | 529% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 66 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.737 | 18.339 | 124% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 25000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 215M | 183B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 1.10 | 44% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.78 | 24.75 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.89 | 58.17 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.62 | 42.07 | 39% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.94 | 156.41 | 43% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers