Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KCSIX vs NAESX
KCSIX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts KCSIX vs NAESX
KCSIX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KCSIX vs. NAESX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KCSIX is a Buy and NAESX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 183B vs. KCSIX (210M). NAESX pays higher dividends than KCSIX: NAESX (1.08) vs KCSIX (0.43). KCSIX was incepted earlier than NAESX: KCSIX (11 years) vs NAESX (66 years). KCSIX (0.90) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). KCSIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. NAESX (17.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than KCSIX: NAESX (0) vs KCSIX (25000). NAESX (28.50) and KCSIX (28.04) have marching annual gain over last year. NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 34.56 vs. KCSIX (11.38).
| KCSIX | NAESX | KCSIX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.17 | 529% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.17 | 529% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 66 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.184 | 15.064 | 141% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 25000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 210M | 183B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.43 | 1.08 | 39% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.04 | 28.50 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.11 | 56.99 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.38 | 34.56 | 33% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.82 | 172.26 | 46% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement