Ad is loading...
KCVSX vs RMEBX
KCVSX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts KCVSX vs RMEBX
Knights of Columbus Large Cap Value S
Price$16.22
Change+$0.16 (+1.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets240.16M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$53.77
Change+$0.51 (+0.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets97.18B
KCVSX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KCVSX vs. RMEBX commentary
Apr 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KCVSX is a StrongBuy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 97.2B vs. KCVSX (240M). KCVSX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: KCVSX (1.34) vs RMEBX (1.18). KCVSX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: KCVSX (10 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than KCVSX (1.00). KCVSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). KCVSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: KCVSX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.05 vs. KCVSX (-5.24). KCVSX return over 5 years is better than : 70.62 vs. RMEBX (55.12).
| KCVSX | RMEBX | KCVSX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 1.07 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 1.07 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.795 | -1.792 | 268% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 240M | 97.2B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.34 | 1.18 | 114% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.24 | 4.05 | -129% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.55 | 6.83 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 70.62 | 55.12 | 128% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 55.55 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...