Ad is loading...
KCVSX vs RMEBX
KCVSX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts KCVSX vs RMEBX
Knights of Columbus Large Cap Value S
Price$17.41
Change-$0.24 (-1.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets256.29M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$57.54
Change-$0.62 (-1.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.48B
KCVSX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KCVSX vs. RMEBX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KCVSX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. KCVSX (256M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than KCVSX: RMEBX (1.54) vs KCVSX (0.99). KCVSX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: KCVSX (10 years) vs RMEBX (10 years). KCVSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. RMEBX (25.00). KCVSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: KCVSX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.88 vs. KCVSX (6.97). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 40.75 vs. KCVSX (38.58).
| KCVSX | RMEBX | KCVSX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.774 | 4.809 | 58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 256M | 105B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 1.54 | 65% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.97 | 10.88 | 64% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.38 | 19.18 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.58 | 40.75 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 63.29 | - |