Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KCVSX vs RMEBX
KCVSX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts KCVSX vs RMEBX
Knights of Columbus Large Cap Value S
Price$17.84
Change-$0.02 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets278.16M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$59.68
Change-$0.04 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.54B
KCVSX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KCVSX vs. RMEBX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KCVSX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. KCVSX (278M). KCVSX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: KCVSX (1.38) vs RMEBX (1.11). KCVSX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: KCVSX (10 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than KCVSX (0.86). KCVSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). KCVSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: KCVSX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.92 vs. KCVSX (6.04). KCVSX return over 5 years is better than : 64.28 vs. RMEBX (53.14).
| KCVSX | RMEBX | KCVSX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.07 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.07 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.245 | 9.293 | 67% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 278M | 109B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.38 | 1.11 | 125% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.04 | 10.92 | 55% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.25 | 25.02 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 64.28 | 53.14 | 121% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.43 | 74.65 | 140% |