Ad is loading...
KCVSX vs RMEBX
KCVSX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts KCVSX vs RMEBX
Knights of Columbus Large Cap Value S
Price$17.15
Change-$0.07 (-0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets262.53M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$56.12
Change-$0.24 (-0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets103.07B
KCVSX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KCVSX vs. RMEBX commentary
May 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KCVSX is a StrongBuy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 103B vs. KCVSX (263M). KCVSX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: KCVSX (1.37) vs RMEBX (1.21). KCVSX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: KCVSX (10 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than KCVSX (0.86). KCVSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). KCVSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: KCVSX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.12 vs. KCVSX (-0.53). KCVSX return over 5 years is better than : 79.70 vs. RMEBX (61.16).
| KCVSX | RMEBX | KCVSX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.07 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.07 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.082 | 2.938 | 71% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 263M | 103B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.37 | 1.21 | 114% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.53 | 6.12 | -9% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.83 | 18.01 | 127% |
| Returns for 5 years | 79.70 | 61.16 | 130% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 60.50 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...