Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KCVSX vs RMEBX
KCVSX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts KCVSX vs RMEBX
Knights of Columbus Large Cap Value S
Price$17.53
Change+$0.15 (+0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets267.94M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$57.95
Change+$0.31 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.22B
KCVSX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KCVSX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KCVSX is a StrongBuy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. KCVSX (268M). KCVSX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: KCVSX (1.32) vs RMEBX (1.16). KCVSX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: KCVSX (10 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than KCVSX (0.86). KCVSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). KCVSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: KCVSX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.87 vs. KCVSX (2.49). KCVSX return over 5 years is better than : 57.21 vs. RMEBX (50.55).
| KCVSX | RMEBX | KCVSX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.07 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.07 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.030 | 5.842 | 52% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 268M | 105B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.32 | 1.16 | 114% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.49 | 8.87 | 28% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.92 | 17.32 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.21 | 50.55 | 113% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 68.95 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement