Ad is loading...
KCVSX vs RMEBX
KCVSX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts KCVSX vs RMEBX
Knights of Columbus Large Cap Value S
Price$17.46
Change+$0.11 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets258.21M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$56.08
Change+$0.30 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets103.41B
KCVSX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KCVSX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KCVSX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 103B vs. KCVSX (258M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than KCVSX: RMEBX (1.54) vs KCVSX (0.99). KCVSX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: KCVSX (10 years) vs RMEBX (10 years). KCVSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. RMEBX (25.00). KCVSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: KCVSX (0) vs RMEBX (250). KCVSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.27 vs. RMEBX (12.29). KCVSX (37.64) and RMEBX (36.84) have equivalent 5 years return.
| KCVSX | RMEBX | KCVSX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.070 | 2.149 | 143% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 258M | 103B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 1.54 | 65% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.27 | 12.29 | 116% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.50 | 12.11 | 128% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.64 | 36.84 | 102% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 63.72 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...