Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KCVSX vs RMEBX
KCVSX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts KCVSX vs RMEBX
KCVSX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KCVSX vs. RMEBX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KCVSX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. KCVSX (367M). KCVSX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: KCVSX (1.05) vs RMEBX (0.99). KCVSX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: KCVSX (11 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than KCVSX (0.85). KCVSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). KCVSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: KCVSX (0) vs RMEBX (250). KCVSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.25 vs. RMEBX (8.96). KCVSX return over 5 years is better than : 44.04 vs. RMEBX (36.13).
| KCVSX | RMEBX | KCVSX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.07 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.07 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.485 | 9.416 | 186% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 367M | 118B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.05 | 0.99 | 106% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.25 | 8.96 | 226% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.48 | 32.63 | 152% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.04 | 36.13 | 122% |
| Returns for 10 years | 152.23 | 90.64 | 168% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement