Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KCVSX vs RMEBX
KCVSX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts KCVSX vs RMEBX
KCVSX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KCVSX vs. RMEBX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KCVSX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. KCVSX (376M). KCVSX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: KCVSX (1.05) vs RMEBX (0.99). KCVSX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: KCVSX (11 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than KCVSX (0.85). KCVSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). KCVSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: KCVSX (0) vs RMEBX (250). KCVSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.29 vs. RMEBX (9.03). KCVSX return over 5 years is better than : 45.82 vs. RMEBX (35.75).
| KCVSX | RMEBX | KCVSX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.07 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.07 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.088 | 10.367 | 184% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 376M | 118B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.05 | 0.99 | 106% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.29 | 9.03 | 214% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.04 | 38.30 | 149% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.82 | 35.75 | 128% |
| Returns for 10 years | 150.17 | 90.55 | 166% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement