Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KCVSX vs RMEBX
KCVSX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts KCVSX vs RMEBX
KCVSX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KCVSX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KCVSX is a StrongBuy and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. KCVSX (381M). KCVSX (1.08) and RMEBX (1.04) have matching dividends . KCVSX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: KCVSX (11 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than KCVSX (0.85). KCVSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). KCVSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: KCVSX (0) vs RMEBX (250). KCVSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.57 vs. RMEBX (10.14). KCVSX return over 5 years is better than : 44.62 vs. RMEBX (35.62).
| KCVSX | RMEBX | KCVSX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.07 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.07 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.484 | 6.444 | 240% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 381M | 117B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.08 | 1.04 | 105% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.57 | 10.14 | 203% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.26 | 34.54 | 157% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.62 | 35.62 | 125% |
| Returns for 10 years | 159.43 | 94.57 | 169% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement