Ad is loading...
KCVSX vs RMFCX
KCVSX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts KCVSX vs RMFCX
Knights of Columbus Large Cap Value S
Price$17.15
Change-$0.07 (-0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets262.53M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$55.81
Change-$0.24 (-0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets103.07B
KCVSX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KCVSX vs. RMFCX commentary
May 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KCVSX is a StrongBuy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 103B vs. KCVSX (263M). KCVSX (1.37) and RMFCX (1.37) have matching dividends . KCVSX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: KCVSX (10 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than KCVSX (0.86). KCVSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). KCVSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: KCVSX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.26 vs. KCVSX (-0.42). KCVSX return over 5 years is better than : 79.74 vs. RMFCX (62.35).
| KCVSX | RMFCX | KCVSX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.91 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.91 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.904 | 2.998 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 263M | 103B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.37 | 1.37 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.42 | 6.26 | -7% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.62 | 18.52 | 122% |
| Returns for 5 years | 79.74 | 62.35 | 128% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 61.94 | - |