Ad is loading...
KCVSX vs RMFCX
KCVSX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts KCVSX vs RMFCX
Knights of Columbus Large Cap Value S
Price$17.46
Change+$0.11 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets258.21M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$55.77
Change+$0.30 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets103.41B
KCVSX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KCVSX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KCVSX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 103B vs. KCVSX (258M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than KCVSX: RMFCX (1.69) vs KCVSX (0.99). KCVSX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: KCVSX (10 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). KCVSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. RMFCX (25.00). KCVSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: KCVSX (0) vs RMFCX (250). KCVSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.27 vs. RMFCX (12.43). RMFCX (37.82) and KCVSX (37.64) have equivalent 5 years return.
| KCVSX | RMFCX | KCVSX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.070 | 2.162 | 142% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 258M | 103B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 1.69 | 59% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.27 | 12.43 | 115% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.50 | 12.60 | 123% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.64 | 37.82 | 100% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 65.18 | - |