Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KCVSX vs RMFCX
KCVSX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts KCVSX vs RMFCX
Knights of Columbus Large Cap Value S
Price$18.76
Change-$0.02 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets290.75M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$62.10
Change-$0.10 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.6B
KCVSX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KCVSX vs. RMFCX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KCVSX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 113B vs. KCVSX (291M). KCVSX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: KCVSX (1.30) vs RMFCX (1.20). KCVSX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: KCVSX (10 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than KCVSX (0.86). KCVSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). KCVSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: KCVSX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.11 vs. KCVSX (3.89). KCVSX return over 5 years is better than : 68.61 vs. RMFCX (59.28).
| KCVSX | RMFCX | KCVSX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.91 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.91 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.080 | 14.779 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 291M | 113B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.30 | 1.20 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.89 | 8.11 | 48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.59 | 43.61 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 68.61 | 59.28 | 116% |
| Returns for 10 years | 127.11 | 93.90 | 135% |