Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KCVSX vs RMFCX
KCVSX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts KCVSX vs RMFCX
Knights of Columbus Large Cap Value S
Price$18.51
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets272.77M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.57
Change+$0.10 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.91B
KCVSX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KCVSX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KCVSX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. KCVSX (273M). KCVSX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: KCVSX (1.38) vs RMFCX (1.26). KCVSX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: KCVSX (10 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than KCVSX (0.86). KCVSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). KCVSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: KCVSX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.98 vs. KCVSX (3.66). KCVSX return over 5 years is better than : 66.92 vs. RMFCX (54.21).
| KCVSX | RMFCX | KCVSX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.91 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.91 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.112 | 11.642 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 273M | 109B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.38 | 1.26 | 110% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.66 | 6.98 | 52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.52 | 29.24 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 66.92 | 54.21 | 123% |
| Returns for 10 years | 126.79 | 91.22 | 139% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement