Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KCVSX vs RMFCX
KCVSX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts KCVSX vs RMFCX
Knights of Columbus Large Cap Value S
Price$17.53
Change+$0.15 (+0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets267.94M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$57.64
Change+$0.31 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.22B
KCVSX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KCVSX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KCVSX is a StrongBuy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. KCVSX (268M). KCVSX (1.32) and RMFCX (1.31) have matching dividends . KCVSX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: KCVSX (10 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than KCVSX (0.86). KCVSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). KCVSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: KCVSX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.01 vs. KCVSX (2.49). KCVSX return over 5 years is better than : 57.21 vs. RMFCX (51.66).
| KCVSX | RMFCX | KCVSX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.91 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.91 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.030 | 5.919 | 51% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 268M | 105B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.32 | 1.31 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.49 | 9.01 | 28% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.92 | 17.82 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.21 | 51.66 | 111% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 70.47 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement