Ad is loading...
KCVSX vs RMFCX
KCVSX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts KCVSX vs RMFCX
Knights of Columbus Large Cap Value S
Price$15.30
Change-$0.19 (-1.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets231.27M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$50.23
Change-$0.51 (-1.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets93.16B
KCVSX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KCVSX vs. RMFCX commentary
Apr 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KCVSX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 93.2B vs. KCVSX (231M). KCVSX (1.34) and RMFCX (1.34) have matching dividends . KCVSX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: KCVSX (10 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). KCVSX (1.00) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). KCVSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). KCVSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: KCVSX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.25 vs. KCVSX (-10.98). KCVSX return over 5 years is better than : 59.92 vs. RMFCX (45.42).
| KCVSX | RMFCX | KCVSX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.91 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.91 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.174 | -7.697 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 231M | 93.2B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.34 | 1.34 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.98 | -4.25 | 258% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.81 | -0.65 | -432% |
| Returns for 5 years | 59.92 | 45.42 | 132% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 46.29 | - |