Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KCVSX vs RMFCX
KCVSX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts KCVSX vs RMFCX
Knights of Columbus Large Cap Value S
Price$18.82
Change-$0.06 (-0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets293.64M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.02
Change+$0.09 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.8B
KCVSX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KCVSX vs. RMFCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KCVSX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. KCVSX (294M). KCVSX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: KCVSX (1.31) vs RMFCX (1.21). KCVSX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: KCVSX (10 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than KCVSX (0.86). KCVSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). KCVSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: KCVSX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.00 vs. KCVSX (0.60). KCVSX return over 5 years is better than : 60.27 vs. RMFCX (52.67).
| KCVSX | RMFCX | KCVSX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.91 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.91 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.677 | 12.783 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 294M | 110B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.31 | 1.21 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.60 | 6.00 | 10% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.56 | 27.94 | 124% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.27 | 52.67 | 114% |
| Returns for 10 years | 120.76 | 84.73 | 143% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers