Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KCVSX vs RMFCX
KCVSX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts KCVSX vs RMFCX
KCVSX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KCVSX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KCVSX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. KCVSX (376M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than KCVSX: RMFCX (1.15) vs KCVSX (1.05). KCVSX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: KCVSX (11 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than KCVSX (0.85). KCVSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). KCVSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: KCVSX (0) vs RMFCX (250). KCVSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.29 vs. RMFCX (9.14). KCVSX return over 5 years is better than : 45.82 vs. RMFCX (36.70).
| KCVSX | RMFCX | KCVSX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.91 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.91 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.088 | 10.454 | 183% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 376M | 118B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.05 | 1.15 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.29 | 9.14 | 211% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.04 | 38.82 | 147% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.82 | 36.70 | 125% |
| Returns for 10 years | 150.17 | 92.27 | 163% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement