Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KCXIX vs RWMFX
KCXIX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts KCXIX vs RWMFX
Knights of Columbus U.S. All Cap Idx I
Price$20.11
Change-$0.57 (-2.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets275.4M
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$65.73
Change-$1.44 (-2.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets203.61B
KCXIX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KCXIX vs. RWMFX commentary
Oct 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KCXIX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 204B vs. KCXIX (275M). RWMFX pays higher dividends than KCXIX: RWMFX (1.42) vs KCXIX (0.95). KCXIX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: KCXIX (6 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). KCXIX (0.43) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. KCXIX (3.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than KCXIX: RWMFX (250) vs KCXIX (25000). KCXIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.82 vs. RWMFX (3.37). KCXIX return over 5 years is better than : 102.71 vs. RWMFX (48.32).
| KCXIX | RWMFX | KCXIX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.25 | 0.31 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.43 | 0.31 | 139% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.066 | 8.050 | 200% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 25000 | 250 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 275M | 204B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 1.42 | 67% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.82 | 3.37 | 529% |
| Returns for 3 years | 96.17 | 44.31 | 217% |
| Returns for 5 years | 102.71 | 48.32 | 213% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 79.15 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement