Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KCXIX vs RWMFX
KCXIX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts KCXIX vs RWMFX
KCXIX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KCXIX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jun 22, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KCXIX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. KCXIX (367M). RWMFX pays higher dividends than KCXIX: RWMFX (1.40) vs KCXIX (0.81). KCXIX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: KCXIX (6 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). KCXIX (0.46) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. KCXIX (13.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than KCXIX: RWMFX (250) vs KCXIX (25000). KCXIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.19 vs. RWMFX (8.54). KCXIX return over 5 years is better than : 79.75 vs. RWMFX (30.09).
| KCXIX | RWMFX | KCXIX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.25 | 0.31 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.46 | 0.31 | 148% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.355 | 2.080 | 546% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 25000 | 250 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 367M | 218B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.81 | 1.40 | 57% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.19 | 8.54 | 295% |
| Returns for 3 years | 68.46 | 24.40 | 281% |
| Returns for 5 years | 79.75 | 30.09 | 265% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 80.41 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement