Advertisement
KEQU vs XMAX
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KEQU is a Hold and XMAX is a Hold.
| KEQU | XMAX | KEQU / XMAX | |
| Capitalization | 99.7M | 553M | 18% |
| EBITDA | 23.9M | -4.45M | -537% |
| Gain YTD | -3.315 | 42.500 | -8% |
| P/E Ratio | 12.48 | 17.14 | 73% |
| Revenue | 282M | 16M | 1,763% |
| Total Cash | 9.95M | 34.6M | 29% |
| Total Debt | 30.2M | 5.61M | 539% |
KEQU | XMAX | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 79 | 55 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 97 Overvalued | 74 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 64 | 32 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 59 | 20 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 71 | 41 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 29 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
XMAX's Valuation (74) in the Home Furnishings industry is in the same range as KEQU (97) in the Office Equipment Or Supplies industry. This means that XMAX’s stock grew similarly to KEQU’s over the last 12 months.
XMAX's Profit vs Risk Rating (32) in the Home Furnishings industry is in the same range as KEQU (64) in the Office Equipment Or Supplies industry. This means that XMAX’s stock grew similarly to KEQU’s over the last 12 months.
XMAX's SMR Rating (20) in the Home Furnishings industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KEQU (59) in the Office Equipment Or Supplies industry. This means that XMAX’s stock grew somewhat faster than KEQU’s over the last 12 months.
XMAX's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Home Furnishings industry is in the same range as KEQU (71) in the Office Equipment Or Supplies industry. This means that XMAX’s stock grew similarly to KEQU’s over the last 12 months.
KEQU's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the Office Equipment Or Supplies industry is significantly better than the same rating for XMAX (100) in the Home Furnishings industry. This means that KEQU’s stock grew significantly faster than XMAX’s over the last 12 months.
| KEQU | XMAX | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 74% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% | 4 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 90% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
KEQU’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while XMAX’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- KEQU’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- XMAX’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
KEQU’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while XMAX’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- KEQU’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- XMAX’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
Price Growth
KEQU (@Home Furnishings) experienced а -2.22% price change this week, while XMAX (@Home Furnishings) price change was -0.93% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Home Furnishings industry was -3.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was +266.41%.
Reported Earning Dates
KEQU is expected to report earnings on Sep 16, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Home Furnishings (-3.54% weekly)The home furnishings industry includes companies that sell items like furniture, appliances, rugs, cooking utensils, and art objects. According to Mordor Intelligence, the U.S. home decor market is estimated to grow at CAGR 7.5% between 2019 and 2024. The market is being increasingly penetrated by e-commerce and m-commerce, while growing urbanization, and, consumers’ rising interest towards home decor are driving demand for the industry. Mohawk Industries, Inc., La-Z-Boy Incorporated, Leggett & Platt, Incorporated are some of the prominent companies in this space. Being usually discretionary for consumers, demand for furnishings could be affected by macroeconomic cycles.
Advertisement
KEQU and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that KEQU and VIOT have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KEQU and VIOT's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KEQU | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KEQU | 100% | +4.73% | ||
| VIOT - KEQU | 30% Poorly correlated | +2.94% | ||
| ETD - KEQU | 24% Poorly correlated | +0.37% | ||
| LZB - KEQU | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.71% | ||
| ATER - KEQU | 20% Poorly correlated | -9.81% | ||
| BSET - KEQU | 20% Poorly correlated | -2.27% | ||
More | ||||
XMAX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that XMAX and MWYN have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that XMAX and MWYN's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XMAX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XMAX | 100% | +0.12% | ||
| MWYN - XMAX | 12% Poorly correlated | +0.09% | ||
| KEQU - XMAX | 11% Poorly correlated | +4.73% | ||
| VIRC - XMAX | 9% Poorly correlated | +0.81% | ||
| BSET - XMAX | 8% Poorly correlated | -2.27% | ||
| TILE - XMAX | 7% Poorly correlated | +0.83% | ||
More | ||||