KF
Price
$72.82
Change
-$0.09 (-0.12%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Net Assets
350.59M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
VPL
Price
$114.68
Change
+$0.39 (+0.34%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Net Assets
13.83B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

KF vs VPL

Header iconKF vs VPL Comparison
Open Charts KF vs VPLBanner chart's image
KF vs VPL Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? The Korea Fund, Inc. (KF) vs. Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF (VPL)

Key Takeaways

  • The Korea Fund, Inc. (KF) is a closed-end fund focused exclusively on South Korean equities with a concentrated portfolio of approximately 53–57 holdings and a high expense ratio of about 1.75%.
  • Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF (VPL) is a low-cost passive exchange-traded fund tracking the FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan Index, offering broad exposure across multiple Pacific markets with over 2,300 holdings and an expense ratio of 0.07%.
  • KF provides deep, concentrated exposure to South Korea’s technology and financial sectors, while VPL delivers diversified regional exposure including significant allocations to Japan, South Korea, and Australia.
  • Structural differences include KF’s closed-end structure, which can trade at premiums or discounts to net asset value, versus VPL’s open-end ETF structure with tight tracking and high liquidity.
  • Expense ratios create a significant long-term cost advantage for VPL, while KF’s active management style targets specific Korean opportunities at higher ongoing fees.
  • Both funds share exposure to Pacific region growth themes but differ markedly in diversification, cost efficiency, and risk concentration profiles.

Introduction

Investors seeking Pacific region equity exposure often compare concentrated single-country strategies with broader regional index funds. The Korea Fund, Inc. (KF) and Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF (VPL) target overlapping yet distinct goals: KF emphasizes South Korean equities through an actively managed closed-end structure, while VPL provides passive, diversified access to developed Asia-Pacific markets excluding Japan. These vehicles do not compete directly but serve as alternative approaches for investors pursuing growth in technology, industrials, and financial sectors across the region.

The Korea Fund, Inc. (KF) Overview

The Korea Fund, Inc. (KF) is a closed-end fund that seeks long-term capital appreciation by investing primarily in equity securities listed on the Korea Exchange. It typically holds 53–57 securities, with top positions concentrated in Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., SK Hynix, Inc., and other leading Korean companies in information technology and financials. Sector allocations are heavily weighted toward information technology (around 51%) and industrials (around 18.5%), with notable exposure to financials. The fund maintains an expense ratio of approximately 1.75%. As a closed-end vehicle, it employs active management without a strict index replication mandate and may trade at a premium or discount to its net asset value.

Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF (VPL) Overview

Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF (VPL) is a passive exchange-traded fund designed to track the performance of the FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan Index. It holds more than 2,300 large- and mid-cap stocks across developed Pacific markets, with country allocations led by Japan (approximately 53–57%), followed by South Korea (18–21%) and Australia. Sector weights emphasize technology (around 23%), industrials (around 21%), and financial services (around 19%). The fund features a low expense ratio of 0.07% and uses full replication methodology with low portfolio turnover. Its open-end ETF structure ensures high liquidity and close tracking to the benchmark index.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The Pacific equity markets continue to be shaped by technology sector innovation, semiconductor supply chain dynamics, and regional economic integration. Macroeconomic drivers include interest rate policies in major economies, trade relationships between the United States and Asian nations, and capital expenditure cycles in electronics manufacturing. Regulatory developments around data privacy, export controls on advanced chips, and environmental standards influence sector performance. Broader capital flows into developed Asia-Pacific equities reflect investor interest in diversification beyond U.S. markets amid shifting global growth patterns.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, VPL’s broad diversification has provided more stable relative positioning across varying economic conditions, benefiting from balanced exposure to multiple countries and sectors. KF’s concentrated South Korean focus has delivered differentiated returns tied to domestic earnings cycles in semiconductors and financial services, though with higher volatility due to its narrower mandate. During periods of regional rotation favoring technology leaders or financial recovery, the two vehicles have shown distinct sensitivity to earnings momentum in top holdings and interest rate expectations.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the tool to discover ideas aligned with your strategy.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors including substantially lower expense ratio, broader diversification across countries and holdings, and consistent index-tracking methodology, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign higher probabilistic favorability to Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF (VPL) for most investors seeking efficient Pacific exposure. KF’s concentrated approach may appeal in specific scenarios emphasizing South Korean opportunities, but its higher costs and narrower profile introduce greater relative risk.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
KF vs. VPL commentary
Jun 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KF is a Hold and VPL is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VPL has more net assets: 13.8B vs. KF (351M). KF has a higher annual dividend yield than VPL: KF (100.496) vs VPL (26.858). KF was incepted earlier than VPL: KF (42 years) vs VPL (21 years). VPL (0.07) has a lower expense ratio than KF (1.25). KF has a higher turnover VPL (7.00) vs VPL (7.00).
KFVPLKF / VPL
Gain YTD100.49626.858374%
Net Assets351M13.8B3%
Total Expense Ratio1.250.071,786%
Turnover63.007.00900%
Yield1.612.7658%
Fund Existence42 years21 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KFVPL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
KF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
VPL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GSSMX36.870.44
+1.21%
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value A
PMVAX18.540.05
+0.27%
Putnam Sustainable Future A
FFANX14.950.03
+0.20%
Fidelity Asset Manager 40%
LGRCX22.55N/A
N/A
Loomis Sayles Growth C
JSVTX16.83N/A
N/A
Janus Henderson Small-Mid Cap Value T

VPL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VPL has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VPL jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VPL
1D Price
Change %
VPL100%
+0.34%
BHP - VPL
69%
Closely correlated
+3.20%
RIO - VPL
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.65%
MFG - VPL
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.68%
ING - VPL
63%
Loosely correlated
+1.79%
ASX - VPL
58%
Loosely correlated
+3.59%
More