Ad is loading...
KGC
Price
$9.25
Change
-$0.14 (-1.49%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
87 days until earnings call
PAAS
Price
$21.41
Change
-$0.47 (-2.15%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
94 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

KGC vs PAAS

Header iconKGC vs PAAS Comparison
Open Charts KGC vs PAASBanner chart's image
Kinross Gold
Price$9.25
Change-$0.14 (-1.49%)
Volume$15.12M
CapitalizationN/A
Pan American Silver
Price$21.41
Change-$0.47 (-2.15%)
Volume$10.32M
CapitalizationN/A
KGC vs PAAS Comparison Chart
Loading...
KGC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
PAAS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KGC vs. PAAS commentary
Nov 17, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KGC is a StrongSell and PAAS is a StrongSell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 17, 2024
Stock price -- (KGC: $9.25 vs. PAAS: $21.41)
Brand notoriety: KGC and PAAS are both notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KGC: 91% vs. PAAS: 266%
Market capitalization -- KGC: $7.52B vs. PAAS: $5.59B
KGC [@Precious Metals] is valued at $7.52B. PAAS’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $5.59B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KGC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePAAS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • KGC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PAAS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, KGC is a better buy in the long-term than PAAS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KGC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PAAS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • KGC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • PAAS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, KGC is a better buy in the short-term than PAAS.

Price Growth

KGC (@Precious Metals) experienced а -11.65% price change this week, while PAAS (@Precious Metals) price change was -5.43% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -5.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

KGC is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2025.

PAAS is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-5.50% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KGC($7.52B) has a higher market cap than PAAS($5.59B). KGC YTD gains are higher at: 54.831 vs. PAAS (33.472). KGC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.76B vs. PAAS (296M). KGC has higher revenues than PAAS: KGC (4.24B) vs PAAS (2.02B).
KGCPAASKGC / PAAS
Capitalization7.52B5.59B135%
EBITDA1.76B296M596%
Gain YTD54.83133.472164%
P/E Ratio18.12N/A-
Revenue4.24B2.02B210%
Total Cash352MN/A-
Total Debt2.26BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KGC vs PAAS: Fundamental Ratings
KGC
PAAS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7560
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
15
Undervalued
12
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4171
SMR RATING
1..100
7487
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4648
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9353
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PAAS's Valuation (12) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as KGC (15). This means that PAAS’s stock grew similarly to KGC’s over the last 12 months.

KGC's Profit vs Risk Rating (41) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as PAAS (71). This means that KGC’s stock grew similarly to PAAS’s over the last 12 months.

KGC's SMR Rating (74) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as PAAS (87). This means that KGC’s stock grew similarly to PAAS’s over the last 12 months.

KGC's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as PAAS (48). This means that KGC’s stock grew similarly to PAAS’s over the last 12 months.

PAAS's P/E Growth Rating (53) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KGC (93). This means that PAAS’s stock grew somewhat faster than KGC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KGCPAAS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
KGC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
PAAS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SCHI22.250.02
+0.09%
Schwab 5-10 Year Corp Bd ETF
MAGG20.270.01
+0.03%
Madison Aggregate Bond ETF
DFEV26.56-0.03
-0.11%
Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF
UTWY44.35-0.07
-0.16%
US Treasury 20 Year Bond ETF
FUNL43.44-0.37
-0.84%
CornerCap Fundametrics® Lrg-Cap ETF FUNL

PAAS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAAS has been closely correlated with MAG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PAAS jumps, then MAG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PAAS
1D Price
Change %
PAAS100%
-2.15%
MAG - PAAS
86%
Closely correlated
-1.97%
HL - PAAS
85%
Closely correlated
-1.79%
AEM - PAAS
82%
Closely correlated
-1.13%
AG - PAAS
80%
Closely correlated
-1.63%
FSM - PAAS
79%
Closely correlated
-0.43%
More