KIM
Price
$22.34
Change
+$0.12 (+0.54%)
Updated
Oct 24 closing price
Capitalization
15.13B
4 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
LAMR
Price
$120.19
Change
+$0.14 (+0.12%)
Updated
Oct 24 closing price
Capitalization
12.17B
11 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

KIM vs LAMR

Header iconKIM vs LAMR Comparison
Open Charts KIM vs LAMRBanner chart's image
Kimco Realty
Price$22.34
Change+$0.12 (+0.54%)
Volume$2.36M
Capitalization15.13B
Lamar Advertising
Price$120.19
Change+$0.14 (+0.12%)
Volume$259.24K
Capitalization12.17B
KIM vs LAMR Comparison Chart in %
KIM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LAMR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KIM vs. LAMR commentary
Oct 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KIM is a Buy and LAMR is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 27, 2025
Stock price -- (KIM: $22.34 vs. LAMR: $120.19)
Brand notoriety: KIM and LAMR are both not notable
KIM represents the Real Estate Investment Trusts, while LAMR is part of the Specialty Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KIM: 60% vs. LAMR: 53%
Market capitalization -- KIM: $15.13B vs. LAMR: $12.17B
KIM [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $15.13B. LAMR’s [@Specialty Telecommunications] market capitalization is $12.17B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Telecommunications] industry ranges from $89.68B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $6.21B. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Telecommunications] industry is $16.37B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KIM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLAMR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • KIM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LAMR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LAMR is a better buy in the long-term than KIM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KIM’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LAMR’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • KIM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • LAMR’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LAMR is a better buy in the short-term than KIM.

Price Growth

KIM (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а +2.29% price change this week, while LAMR (@Specialty Telecommunications) price change was +0.98% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +0.90%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.97%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Telecommunications industry was +1.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.92%.

Reported Earning Dates

KIM is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

LAMR is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+0.90% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

@Specialty Telecommunications (+1.18% weekly)

Companies belonging to the specialty telecommunications sector provide voice and data transmission via a single method, such as fixed lines, digital subscriber lines (DSL), wireless technology, the internet or competitive local exchange carriers. Telefonica, Liberty Broadband Corp., and Zayo Group Holdings, Inc. are some of the big specialty telecom companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KIM($15.1B) has a higher market cap than LAMR($12.2B). LAMR (28.02) and KIM (27.24) have similar P/E ratio . LAMR YTD gains are higher at: 2.718 vs. KIM (-1.273). KIM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.41B vs. LAMR (1.09B). LAMR has less debt than KIM: LAMR (4.77B) vs KIM (8.28B). LAMR has higher revenues than KIM: LAMR (2.23B) vs KIM (2.1B).
KIMLAMRKIM / LAMR
Capitalization15.1B12.2B124%
EBITDA1.41B1.09B129%
Gain YTD-1.2732.718-47%
P/E Ratio27.2428.0297%
Revenue2.1B2.23B94%
Total Cash227MN/A-
Total Debt8.28B4.77B174%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KIM vs LAMR: Fundamental Ratings
KIM
LAMR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3519
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
66
Overvalued
39
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4420
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5259
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9043
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LAMR's Valuation (39) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as KIM (66). This means that LAMR’s stock grew similarly to KIM’s over the last 12 months.

LAMR's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as KIM (44). This means that LAMR’s stock grew similarly to KIM’s over the last 12 months.

LAMR's SMR Rating (100) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as KIM (100). This means that LAMR’s stock grew similarly to KIM’s over the last 12 months.

KIM's Price Growth Rating (52) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as LAMR (59). This means that KIM’s stock grew similarly to LAMR’s over the last 12 months.

LAMR's P/E Growth Rating (43) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KIM (90). This means that LAMR’s stock grew somewhat faster than KIM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KIMLAMR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
50%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
34%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
KIM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LAMR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
XNTK286.284.87
+1.73%
SPDR® NYSE Technology ETF
FGM58.130.60
+1.05%
First Trust Germany AlphaDEX® ETF
BGH15.190.07
+0.46%
Barings Global Short Duration High Yield Fund
XCLR29.96N/A
N/A
Global X S&P 500® Collar 95-110 ETF
ELIS23.30-0.16
-0.66%
Direxion Daily LLY Bear 1X Shares

KIM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KIM has been closely correlated with BRX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KIM jumps, then BRX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KIM
1D Price
Change %
KIM100%
+0.54%
BRX - KIM
88%
Closely correlated
+0.61%
FRT - KIM
86%
Closely correlated
+0.52%
KRG - KIM
86%
Closely correlated
-0.13%
AKR - KIM
82%
Closely correlated
+0.05%
REG - KIM
81%
Closely correlated
+0.22%
More

LAMR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LAMR has been closely correlated with OUT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LAMR jumps, then OUT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LAMR
1D Price
Change %
LAMR100%
+0.12%
OUT - LAMR
80%
Closely correlated
+0.56%
DBRG - LAMR
67%
Closely correlated
+0.16%
AKR - LAMR
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.05%
KIM - LAMR
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.54%
FRT - LAMR
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.52%
More