KINS
Price
$14.29
Change
+$0.20 (+1.42%)
Updated
Nov 19 closing price
Capitalization
202.45M
112 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
L
Price
$105.30
Change
+$0.18 (+0.17%)
Updated
Nov 19 closing price
Capitalization
21.76B
81 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

KINS vs L

Header iconKINS vs L Comparison
Open Charts KINS vs LBanner chart's image
Kingstone Companies
Price$14.29
Change+$0.20 (+1.42%)
Volume$206.83K
Capitalization202.45M
Loews
Price$105.30
Change+$0.18 (+0.17%)
Volume$661.02K
Capitalization21.76B
KINS vs L Comparison Chart in %
KINS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
L
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KINS vs. L commentary
Nov 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KINS is a Hold and L is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 20, 2025
Stock price -- (KINS: $14.31 vs. L: $105.30)
Brand notoriety: KINS and L are both not notable
Both companies represent the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KINS: 152% vs. L: 86%
Market capitalization -- KINS: $202.45M vs. L: $21.76B
KINS [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $202.45M. L’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $21.76B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $130.73B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $17.55B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KINS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileL’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • KINS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • L’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, L is a better buy in the long-term than KINS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KINS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while L’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • KINS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • L’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, L is a better buy in the short-term than KINS.

Price Growth

KINS (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а -4.92% price change this week, while L (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was +1.21% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was -1.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.58%.

Reported Earning Dates

KINS is expected to report earnings on Mar 12, 2026.

L is expected to report earnings on Feb 09, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (-1.07% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
L($21.8B) has a higher market cap than KINS($202M). L has higher P/E ratio than KINS: L (15.23) vs KINS (6.36). L YTD gains are higher at: 24.596 vs. KINS (-5.167). KINS has less debt than L: KINS (5.06M) vs L (8.95B). L has higher revenues than KINS: L (17.8B) vs KINS (186M).
KINSLKINS / L
Capitalization202M21.8B1%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-5.16724.596-21%
P/E Ratio6.3615.2342%
Revenue186M17.8B1%
Total CashN/A6.51B-
Total Debt5.06M8.95B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KINS vs L: Fundamental Ratings
KINS
L
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1425
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
60
Fair valued
75
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
435
SMR RATING
1..100
2395
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5726
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8516
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KINS's Valuation (60) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as L (75) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that KINS’s stock grew similarly to L’s over the last 12 months.

L's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KINS (43) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that L’s stock grew somewhat faster than KINS’s over the last 12 months.

KINS's SMR Rating (23) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is significantly better than the same rating for L (95) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that KINS’s stock grew significantly faster than L’s over the last 12 months.

L's Price Growth Rating (26) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as KINS (57) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that L’s stock grew similarly to KINS’s over the last 12 months.

L's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is significantly better than the same rating for KINS (85) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that L’s stock grew significantly faster than KINS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KINSL
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
41%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
39%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
35%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
38%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
KINS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
L
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FNCL72.960.32
+0.44%
Fidelity MSCI Financials ETF
JDOC57.270.12
+0.21%
JPMorgan Healthcare Leaders ETF
IBHG22.280.01
+0.05%
iShares® iBonds® 2027 Term HY & Inc ETF
TPLS25.59-0.01
-0.04%
Thornburg Core Plus Bond ETF
PFIG24.20-0.03
-0.12%
Invesco Fdmtl Invmt Grd Corp Bd ETF

KINS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KINS has been loosely correlated with SKWD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KINS jumps, then SKWD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KINS
1D Price
Change %
KINS100%
+1.56%
SKWD - KINS
38%
Loosely correlated
-2.36%
HMN - KINS
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.83%
UFCS - KINS
35%
Loosely correlated
-1.89%
PLMR - KINS
35%
Loosely correlated
-3.25%
L - KINS
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.17%
More