Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KLCAX vs RGAHX
KLCAX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts KLCAX vs RGAHX
KLCAX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KLCAX vs. RGAHX commentary
Jul 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KLCAX is a Buy and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. KLCAX (1.14B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than KLCAX: RGAHX (0.40) vs KLCAX (0.00). KLCAX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: KLCAX (19 years) vs RGAHX (11 years). KLCAX (1.20) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). RGAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. KLCAX (18.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than KLCAX: RGAHX (250) vs KLCAX (1500). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.58 vs. KLCAX (-8.47). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 16.15 vs. KLCAX (-56.75).
| KLCAX | RGAHX | KLCAX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.44 | 248% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.44 | 273% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.097 | 7.635 | 185% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.14B | 361B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.40 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.47 | 4.58 | -185% |
| Returns for 3 years | -23.15 | 44.58 | -52% |
| Returns for 5 years | -56.75 | 16.15 | -351% |
| Returns for 10 years | -12.88 | 105.94 | -12% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement