Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KLCAX vs RGEBX
KLCAX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts KLCAX vs RGEBX
KLCAX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KLCAX vs. RGEBX commentary
Jul 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KLCAX is a Buy and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. KLCAX (1.14B). KLCAX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . KLCAX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: KLCAX (19 years) vs RGEBX (12 years). KLCAX (1.20) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.08). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. KLCAX (18.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than KLCAX: RGEBX (250) vs KLCAX (1500). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.59 vs. KLCAX (-8.47). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 12.01 vs. KLCAX (-56.75).
| KLCAX | RGEBX | KLCAX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.08 | 101% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 1.08 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.097 | 7.292 | 193% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.14B | 361B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.47 | 3.59 | -236% |
| Returns for 3 years | -23.15 | 40.85 | -57% |
| Returns for 5 years | -56.75 | 12.01 | -472% |
| Returns for 10 years | -12.88 | 96.93 | -13% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement