Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KLCCX vs RGAHX
KLCCX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts KLCCX vs RGAHX
KLCCX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KLCCX vs. RGAHX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KLCCX is a Buy and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. KLCCX (1.14B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than KLCCX: RGAHX (0.40) vs KLCCX (0.00). KLCCX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: KLCCX (19 years) vs RGAHX (11 years). KLCCX (1.97) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). RGAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. KLCCX (18.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than KLCCX: RGAHX (250) vs KLCCX (1500). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.43 vs. KLCCX (-26.50). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 16.49 vs. KLCCX (-75.15).
| KLCCX | RGAHX | KLCCX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 0.44 | 430% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 0.44 | 448% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.506 | 7.244 | 186% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.14B | 357B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.40 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -26.50 | 4.43 | -598% |
| Returns for 3 years | -53.34 | 39.88 | -134% |
| Returns for 5 years | -75.15 | 16.49 | -456% |
| Returns for 10 years | -53.18 | 102.84 | -52% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement