Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KLCCX vs RGAHX
KLCCX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts KLCCX vs RGAHX
KLCCX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KLCCX vs. RGAHX commentary
Jun 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KLCCX is a Hold and RGAHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. KLCCX (1.18B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than KLCCX: RGAHX (0.39) vs KLCCX (0.00). KLCCX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: KLCCX (19 years) vs RGAHX (11 years). KLCCX (1.97) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). RGAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. KLCCX (18.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than KLCCX: RGAHX (250) vs KLCCX (1500). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.21 vs. KLCCX (-21.39). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 19.69 vs. KLCCX (-74.00).
| KLCCX | RGAHX | KLCCX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 0.44 | 430% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 0.44 | 448% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.825 | 8.796 | 180% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.18B | 361B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.39 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -21.39 | 12.21 | -175% |
| Returns for 3 years | -50.64 | 49.14 | -103% |
| Returns for 5 years | -74.00 | 19.69 | -376% |
| Returns for 10 years | -49.52 | 118.19 | -42% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement