Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KLCCX vs RGEBX
KLCCX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts KLCCX vs RGEBX
KLCCX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KLCCX vs. RGEBX commentary
Jun 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KLCCX is a Hold and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. KLCCX (1.18B). KLCCX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . KLCCX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: KLCCX (19 years) vs RGEBX (12 years). KLCCX (1.97) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.08). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. KLCCX (18.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than KLCCX: RGEBX (250) vs KLCCX (1500). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.13 vs. KLCCX (-21.39). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 15.42 vs. KLCCX (-74.00).
| KLCCX | RGEBX | KLCCX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 1.08 | 175% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 1.08 | 182% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.825 | 8.479 | 187% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.18B | 361B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -21.39 | 11.13 | -192% |
| Returns for 3 years | -50.64 | 45.29 | -112% |
| Returns for 5 years | -74.00 | 15.42 | -480% |
| Returns for 10 years | -49.52 | 108.69 | -46% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement