Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KLCIX vs RGAHX
KLCIX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts KLCIX vs RGAHX
KLCIX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KLCIX vs. RGAHX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KLCIX is a Buy and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. KLCIX (1.14B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than KLCIX: RGAHX (0.40) vs KLCIX (0.00). KLCIX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: KLCIX (19 years) vs RGAHX (11 years). KLCIX (0.95) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). RGAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. KLCIX (18.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than KLCIX: RGAHX (250) vs KLCIX (1000000). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.43 vs. KLCIX (-4.21). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 16.49 vs. KLCIX (-51.34).
| KLCIX | RGAHX | KLCIX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.44 | 191% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.44 | 216% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.013 | 7.244 | 193% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.14B | 357B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.40 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.21 | 4.43 | -95% |
| Returns for 3 years | -17.94 | 39.88 | -45% |
| Returns for 5 years | -51.34 | 16.49 | -311% |
| Returns for 10 years | -0.98 | 102.84 | -1% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement