Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KLCIX vs RGAHX
KLCIX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts KLCIX vs RGAHX
KLCIX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KLCIX vs. RGAHX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KLCIX is a Hold and RGAHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. KLCIX (1.18B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than KLCIX: RGAHX (0.39) vs KLCIX (0.00). KLCIX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: KLCIX (19 years) vs RGAHX (11 years). KLCIX (0.95) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). RGAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. KLCIX (18.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than KLCIX: RGAHX (250) vs KLCIX (1000000). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.21 vs. KLCIX (2.52). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 19.69 vs. KLCIX (-49.07).
| KLCIX | RGAHX | KLCIX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.44 | 191% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.44 | 216% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.339 | 8.796 | 186% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.18B | 361B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.39 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.52 | 12.21 | 21% |
| Returns for 3 years | -13.13 | 49.14 | -27% |
| Returns for 5 years | -49.07 | 19.69 | -249% |
| Returns for 10 years | 6.79 | 118.19 | 6% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement