Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KLCIX vs RGEBX
KLCIX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts KLCIX vs RGEBX
KLCIX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KLCIX vs. RGEBX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KLCIX is a Buy and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. KLCIX (1.14B). KLCIX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . KLCIX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: KLCIX (19 years) vs RGEBX (12 years). RGEBX (1.08) is less costly to investors than KLCIX (0.95). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. KLCIX (18.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than KLCIX: RGEBX (250) vs KLCIX (1000000). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.42 vs. KLCIX (-4.21). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 12.32 vs. KLCIX (-51.34).
| KLCIX | RGEBX | KLCIX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.08 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 1.08 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.013 | 6.888 | 203% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.14B | 357B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.21 | 3.42 | -123% |
| Returns for 3 years | -17.94 | 36.26 | -49% |
| Returns for 5 years | -51.34 | 12.32 | -417% |
| Returns for 10 years | -0.98 | 93.96 | -1% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement