Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KLCIX vs RGEBX
KLCIX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts KLCIX vs RGEBX
KLCIX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KLCIX vs. RGEBX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KLCIX is a StrongBuy and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. KLCIX (1.1B). KLCIX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . KLCIX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: KLCIX (19 years) vs RGEBX (12 years). RGEBX (1.08) is less costly to investors than KLCIX (0.95). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. KLCIX (18.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than KLCIX: RGEBX (250) vs KLCIX (1000000). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.77 vs. KLCIX (-10.92). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 9.71 vs. KLCIX (-54.02).
| KLCIX | RGEBX | KLCIX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.08 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 1.08 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.821 | 8.727 | 147% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.1B | 353B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.92 | -0.77 | 1,412% |
| Returns for 3 years | -20.70 | 39.77 | -52% |
| Returns for 5 years | -54.02 | 9.71 | -557% |
| Returns for 10 years | -1.66 | 97.58 | -2% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers