Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KLCIX vs RGEBX
KLCIX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts KLCIX vs RGEBX
KLCIX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KLCIX vs. RGEBX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KLCIX is a Hold and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. KLCIX (1.18B). KLCIX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . KLCIX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: KLCIX (19 years) vs RGEBX (12 years). RGEBX (1.08) is less costly to investors than KLCIX (0.95). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. KLCIX (18.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than KLCIX: RGEBX (250) vs KLCIX (1000000). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.13 vs. KLCIX (2.52). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 15.42 vs. KLCIX (-49.07).
| KLCIX | RGEBX | KLCIX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.08 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 1.08 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.339 | 8.479 | 193% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.18B | 361B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.52 | 11.13 | 23% |
| Returns for 3 years | -13.13 | 45.29 | -29% |
| Returns for 5 years | -49.07 | 15.42 | -318% |
| Returns for 10 years | 6.79 | 108.69 | 6% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement