Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KLCKX vs RGAHX
KLCKX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts KLCKX vs RGAHX
KLCKX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KLCKX vs. RGAHX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KLCKX is a StrongBuy and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. KLCKX (1.1B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than KLCKX: RGAHX (0.40) vs KLCKX (0.00). KLCKX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: KLCKX (19 years) vs RGAHX (11 years). KLCKX (1.62) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). RGAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. KLCKX (18.00). KLCKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAHX: KLCKX (0) vs RGAHX (250). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.18 vs. KLCKX (-22.02). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 13.78 vs. KLCKX (-68.20).
| KLCKX | RGAHX | KLCKX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.44 | 336% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.62 | 0.44 | 368% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.393 | 9.200 | 135% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.1B | 353B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.40 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -22.02 | 0.18 | -12,265% |
| Returns for 3 years | -41.43 | 43.47 | -95% |
| Returns for 5 years | -68.20 | 13.78 | -495% |
| Returns for 10 years | -35.18 | 106.68 | -33% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement