Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KLCKX vs RGAHX
KLCKX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts KLCKX vs RGAHX
KLCKX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KLCKX vs. RGAHX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KLCKX is a Buy and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. KLCKX (1.14B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than KLCKX: RGAHX (0.40) vs KLCKX (0.00). KLCKX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: KLCKX (19 years) vs RGAHX (11 years). KLCKX (1.62) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). RGAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. KLCKX (18.00). KLCKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAHX: KLCKX (0) vs RGAHX (250). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.43 vs. KLCKX (-16.17). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 16.49 vs. KLCKX (-66.37).
| KLCKX | RGAHX | KLCKX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.44 | 336% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.62 | 0.44 | 368% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.632 | 7.244 | 188% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.14B | 357B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.40 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -16.17 | 4.43 | -365% |
| Returns for 3 years | -39.40 | 39.88 | -99% |
| Returns for 5 years | -66.37 | 16.49 | -403% |
| Returns for 10 years | -34.79 | 102.84 | -34% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement