Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KLCSX vs RGEBX
KLCSX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts KLCSX vs RGEBX
KLCSX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KLCSX vs. RGEBX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KLCSX is a Hold and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. KLCSX (1.17B). KLCSX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . KLCSX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: KLCSX (12 years) vs RGEBX (12 years). RGEBX (1.08) is less costly to investors than KLCSX (0.88). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. KLCSX (18.00). KLCSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGEBX: KLCSX (0) vs RGEBX (250). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.94 vs. KLCSX (3.00). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 21.28 vs. KLCSX (-45.75).
| KLCSX | RGEBX | KLCSX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 1.08 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 1.08 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.152 | 10.227 | 158% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.17B | 338B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.00 | 13.94 | 22% |
| Returns for 3 years | -10.75 | 50.06 | -21% |
| Returns for 5 years | -45.75 | 21.28 | -215% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.43 | 103.93 | 3% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement