Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KLCSX vs VIGRX
KLCSX vs VIGRX Comparison
Open Charts KLCSX vs VIGRX
KLCSX vs VIGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KLCSX vs. VIGRX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KLCSX is a Buy and VIGRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIGRX has more cash in the bank: 379B vs. KLCSX (1.14B). VIGRX pays higher dividends than KLCSX: VIGRX (0.27) vs KLCSX (0.00). KLCSX was incepted earlier than VIGRX: KLCSX (13 years) vs VIGRX (34 years). KLCSX (0.88) is less costly to investors than VIGRX (0.17). KLCSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 18.00 vs. VIGRX (12.00). KLCSX (0) and VIGRX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. VIGRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.73 vs. KLCSX (-3.64). VIGRX return over 5 years is better than : 78.70 vs. KLCSX (-50.44).
| KLCSX | VIGRX | KLCSX / VIGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 0.17 | 459% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.17 | 518% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.111 | 7.483 | 189% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.14B | 379B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.27 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.64 | 18.73 | -19% |
| Returns for 3 years | -16.76 | 81.36 | -21% |
| Returns for 5 years | -50.44 | 78.70 | -64% |
| Returns for 10 years | 1.19 | 374.91 | 0% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement