Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KLGCX vs RGACX
KLGCX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts KLGCX vs RGACX
KLGCX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KLGCX vs. RGACX commentary
Jun 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KLGCX is a Buy and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. KLGCX (1.02B). KLGCX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . KLGCX was incepted earlier than RGACX: KLGCX (13 years) vs RGACX (24 years). KLGCX (2.11) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.93). KLGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than KLGCX: RGACX (250) vs KLGCX (2500). RGACX (12.12) and KLGCX (11.78) have marching annual gain over last year. RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 19.27 vs. KLGCX (0.69).
| KLGCX | RGACX | KLGCX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.07 | 0.93 | 223% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.11 | 0.93 | 227% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.842 | 9.322 | 30% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.02B | 361B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.78 | 12.12 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.80 | 45.44 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.69 | 19.27 | 4% |
| Returns for 10 years | 70.49 | 110.14 | 64% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement