Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KLGNX vs RGACX
KLGNX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts KLGNX vs RGACX
NYLI WMC Growth Investor Class
Price$52.53
Change-$0.18 (-0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.04B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$82.10
Change-$0.06 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
KLGNX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KLGNX vs. RGACX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KLGNX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. KLGNX (1.04B). RGACX pays higher dividends than KLGNX: RGACX (0.07) vs KLGNX (0.00). KLGNX was incepted earlier than RGACX: KLGNX (13 years) vs RGACX (23 years). KLGNX (1.41) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). KLGNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than KLGNX: RGACX (250) vs KLGNX (2500). KLGNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.82 vs. RGACX (14.08). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 41.95 vs. KLGNX (22.53).
| KLGNX | RGACX | KLGNX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 0.94 | 140% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.41 | 0.94 | 150% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.861 | 14.044 | 84% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.04B | 329B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.82 | 14.08 | 105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.69 | 41.19 | 135% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.53 | 41.95 | 54% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.10 | 83.68 | 71% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement