Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KLGNX vs RGACX
KLGNX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts KLGNX vs RGACX
NYLI WMC Growth Investor Class
Price$53.90
Change-$0.04 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.05B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$85.54
Change+$0.03 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets341.24B
KLGNX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KLGNX vs. RGACX commentary
Oct 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KLGNX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 341B vs. KLGNX (1.05B). RGACX pays higher dividends than KLGNX: RGACX (0.07) vs KLGNX (0.00). KLGNX was incepted earlier than RGACX: KLGNX (13 years) vs RGACX (23 years). KLGNX (1.41) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). KLGNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than KLGNX: RGACX (250) vs KLGNX (2500). KLGNX (15.64) and RGACX (15.15) have marching annual gain over last year. RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 45.12 vs. KLGNX (24.48).
| KLGNX | RGACX | KLGNX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 0.94 | 140% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.41 | 0.94 | 150% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.779 | 18.822 | 79% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.05B | 341B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.64 | 15.15 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 85.35 | 66.19 | 129% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.48 | 45.12 | 54% |
| Returns for 10 years | 75.11 | 103.64 | 72% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement