Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KLGNX vs RGACX
KLGNX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts KLGNX vs RGACX
KLGNX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KLGNX vs. RGACX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KLGNX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. KLGNX (1.02B). KLGNX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . KLGNX was incepted earlier than RGACX: KLGNX (13 years) vs RGACX (24 years). KLGNX (1.36) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.93). KLGNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than KLGNX: RGACX (250) vs KLGNX (2500). KLGNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.14 vs. RGACX (7.94). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 13.23 vs. KLGNX (3.36).
| KLGNX | RGACX | KLGNX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 0.93 | 142% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.93 | 146% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.966 | 6.185 | 16% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.02B | 361B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.14 | 7.94 | 140% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.49 | 43.05 | 122% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.36 | 13.23 | 25% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.77 | 107.97 | 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement