Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KLGNX vs RGACX
KLGNX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts KLGNX vs RGACX
KLGNX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KLGNX vs. RGACX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KLGNX is a Buy and RGACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 342B vs. KLGNX (976M). KLGNX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . KLGNX was incepted earlier than RGACX: KLGNX (14 years) vs RGACX (24 years). KLGNX (1.36) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.93). KLGNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than KLGNX: RGACX (250) vs KLGNX (2500). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.90 vs. KLGNX (2.32). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 14.75 vs. KLGNX (-2.07).
| KLGNX | RGACX | KLGNX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 0.93 | 142% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.93 | 146% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.341 | 9.193 | -4% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 976M | 342B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.32 | 4.90 | 47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.77 | 44.95 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.07 | 14.75 | -14% |
| Returns for 10 years | 77.23 | 96.44 | 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement