KMB
Price
$127.53
Change
-$0.38 (-0.30%)
Updated
Jul 18, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
43.58B
14 days until earnings call
UL
Price
$59.72
Change
-$0.07 (-0.12%)
Updated
Jul 18, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
125.74B
13 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

KMB vs UL

Header iconKMB vs UL Comparison
Open Charts KMB vs ULBanner chart's image
Kimberly-Clark
Price$127.53
Change-$0.38 (-0.30%)
Volume$22.48K
Capitalization43.58B
Unilever
Price$59.72
Change-$0.07 (-0.12%)
Volume$10.6K
Capitalization125.74B
KMB vs UL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
KMB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KMB vs. UL commentary
Jul 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KMB is a Hold and UL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 18, 2025
Stock price -- (KMB: $127.91 vs. UL: $59.79)
Brand notoriety: KMB and UL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Household/Personal Care industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KMB: 86% vs. UL: 111%
Market capitalization -- KMB: $43.58B vs. UL: $125.74B
KMB [@Household/Personal Care] is valued at $43.58B. UL’s [@Household/Personal Care] market capitalization is $125.74B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Household/Personal Care] industry ranges from $381.78B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Household/Personal Care] industry is $25.65B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KMB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • KMB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • UL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, UL is a better buy in the long-term than KMB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KMB’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UL’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • KMB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • UL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, UL is a better buy in the short-term than KMB.

Price Growth

KMB (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а -3.06% price change this week, while UL (@Household/Personal Care) price change was -2.73% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was -1.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.70%.

Reported Earning Dates

KMB is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

UL is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Household/Personal Care (-1.07% weekly)

Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UL($126B) has a higher market cap than KMB($43.6B). KMB has higher P/E ratio than UL: KMB (24.72) vs UL (18.03). UL YTD gains are higher at: 7.232 vs. KMB (-0.591). UL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 12B vs. KMB (3.07B). UL has more cash in the bank: 6.11B vs. KMB (1.09B). KMB has less debt than UL: KMB (8.11B) vs UL (28.6B). UL has higher revenues than KMB: UL (59.6B) vs KMB (20.4B).
KMBULKMB / UL
Capitalization43.6B126B35%
EBITDA3.07B12B26%
Gain YTD-0.5917.232-8%
P/E Ratio24.7218.03137%
Revenue20.4B59.6B34%
Total Cash1.09B6.11B18%
Total Debt8.11B28.6B28%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KMB vs UL: Fundamental Ratings
KMB
UL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6262
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
36
Fair valued
31
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8050
SMR RATING
1..100
1198
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6158
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8839
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

UL's Valuation (31) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as KMB (36). This means that UL’s stock grew similarly to KMB’s over the last 12 months.

UL's Profit vs Risk Rating (50) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as KMB (80). This means that UL’s stock grew similarly to KMB’s over the last 12 months.

KMB's SMR Rating (11) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is significantly better than the same rating for UL (98). This means that KMB’s stock grew significantly faster than UL’s over the last 12 months.

UL's Price Growth Rating (58) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as KMB (61). This means that UL’s stock grew similarly to KMB’s over the last 12 months.

UL's P/E Growth Rating (39) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KMB (88). This means that UL’s stock grew somewhat faster than KMB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KMBUL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
34%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
42%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
36%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
34%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
KMB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ITWO37.710.53
+1.44%
ProShares Russell 2000 High Income ETF
NERD25.940.31
+1.20%
Roundhill Video Games ETF
DXJ115.321.12
+0.98%
WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity ETF
PFO9.23N/A
N/A
Flaherty & Crumrine Preferred and Income Opportunity Fund
VCV10.23-0.15
-1.45%
INVESCO CALIFORNIA VALUE MUNI Income TRUST

KMB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KMB has been closely correlated with PG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KMB jumps, then PG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KMB
1D Price
Change %
KMB100%
+0.92%
PG - KMB
75%
Closely correlated
+1.23%
CL - KMB
68%
Closely correlated
-0.48%
CHD - KMB
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.75%
CLX - KMB
54%
Loosely correlated
+1.86%
UL - KMB
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.88%
More