Ad is loading...
KMB
Price
$137.03
Change
+$0.66 (+0.48%)
Updated
Nov 21 closing price
61 days until earnings call
UL
Price
$57.63
Change
+$0.08 (+0.14%)
Updated
Nov 21 closing price
83 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

KMB vs UL

Header iconKMB vs UL Comparison
Open Charts KMB vs ULBanner chart's image
Kimberly-Clark
Price$137.03
Change+$0.66 (+0.48%)
Volume$1.62M
CapitalizationN/A
Unilever
Price$57.63
Change+$0.08 (+0.14%)
Volume$2.93M
CapitalizationN/A
KMB vs UL Comparison Chart
Loading...
KMB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
UL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KMB vs. UL commentary
Nov 22, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KMB is a Buy and UL is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 22, 2024
Stock price -- (KMB: $137.03 vs. UL: $57.63)
Brand notoriety: KMB and UL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Household/Personal Care industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KMB: 80% vs. UL: 153%
Market capitalization -- KMB: $43.58B vs. UL: $125.74B
KMB [@Household/Personal Care] is valued at $43.58B. UL’s [@Household/Personal Care] market capitalization is $125.74B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Household/Personal Care] industry ranges from $381.78B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Household/Personal Care] industry is $24.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KMB’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileUL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • KMB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • UL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, KMB is a better buy in the long-term than UL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KMB’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UL’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • KMB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • UL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, KMB is a better buy in the short-term than UL.

Price Growth

KMB (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а +4.06% price change this week, while UL (@Household/Personal Care) price change was +0.40% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was -0.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.91%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.29%.

Reported Earning Dates

KMB is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2025.

UL is expected to report earnings on Feb 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Household/Personal Care (-0.73% weekly)

Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UL($126B) has a higher market cap than KMB($43.6B). KMB has higher P/E ratio than UL: KMB (24.72) vs UL (18.03). UL YTD gains are higher at: 22.886 vs. KMB (15.864). UL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 12B vs. KMB (3.07B). UL has more cash in the bank: 6.11B vs. KMB (1.09B). KMB has less debt than UL: KMB (8.11B) vs UL (28.6B). UL has higher revenues than KMB: UL (59.6B) vs KMB (20.4B).
KMBULKMB / UL
Capitalization43.6B126B35%
EBITDA3.07B12B26%
Gain YTD15.86422.88669%
P/E Ratio24.7218.03137%
Revenue20.4B59.6B34%
Total Cash1.09B6.11B18%
Total Debt8.11B28.6B28%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KMB vs UL: Fundamental Ratings
KMB
UL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6661
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
57
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4656
SMR RATING
1..100
1098
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5656
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8723
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KMB's Valuation (28) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as UL (57). This means that KMB’s stock grew similarly to UL’s over the last 12 months.

KMB's Profit vs Risk Rating (46) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as UL (56). This means that KMB’s stock grew similarly to UL’s over the last 12 months.

KMB's SMR Rating (10) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is significantly better than the same rating for UL (98). This means that KMB’s stock grew significantly faster than UL’s over the last 12 months.

KMB's Price Growth Rating (56) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as UL (56). This means that KMB’s stock grew similarly to UL’s over the last 12 months.

UL's P/E Growth Rating (23) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KMB (87). This means that UL’s stock grew somewhat faster than KMB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KMBUL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
38%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
41%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
40%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
41%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
46%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
41%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
40%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
43%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
37%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
36%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
34%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
KMB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
UL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AUPH8.770.53
+6.43%
Aurinia Pharmaceuticals
HAL31.870.69
+2.21%
Halliburton Company
HLNE198.173.69
+1.90%
Hamilton Lane
QUAD6.79-0.04
-0.59%
QUAD/GRAPHICS
NMTC0.70-0.03
-3.98%
NeuroOne Medical Technologies Corp

KMB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KMB has been loosely correlated with PG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KMB jumps, then PG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KMB
1D Price
Change %
KMB100%
+0.48%
PG - KMB
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.09%
CHD - KMB
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.86%
CL - KMB
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.36%
CLX - KMB
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.65%
EPC - KMB
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.92%
More

UL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UL has been loosely correlated with CL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UL jumps, then CL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UL
1D Price
Change %
UL100%
+0.14%
CL - UL
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.36%
CHD - UL
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.86%
BDRFY - UL
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.39%
PG - UL
37%
Loosely correlated
+1.09%
KMB - UL
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.48%
More