KMB
Price
$96.40
Change
-$0.27 (-0.28%)
Updated
May 15, 11:43 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
32.09B
74 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
UL
Price
$56.33
Change
-$1.01 (-1.76%)
Updated
May 15, 04:09 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
124.88B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

KMB vs UL

Header iconKMB vs UL Comparison
Open Charts KMB vs ULBanner chart's image
KMB vs UL Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Kimberly-Clark (KMB) vs. Unilever (UL) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • KMB shares have risen about 10.5% YTD, trailing UL's 13.6% gain amid consumer staples sector momentum.
  • Kimberly-Clark's pending $48.7 billion acquisition of Kenvue promises $2.4 billion in cost savings, boosting growth prospects despite debt concerns.
  • Unilever reported 3.5% underlying sales growth in 2025 with margin expansion to 20%, supported by digital transformation and AI initiatives.
  • KMB offers a higher dividend yield at 4.59% versus UL's 3.01%, appealing to income-focused investors.
  • Tickeron rates both as StrongBuy, with KMB stronger on profit vs. risk and short-term technicals.
  • Consumer staples sector rotation favors defensive plays, with UL's larger scale contrasting KMB's acquisition-driven catalysts.

Introduction

Kimberly-Clark (KMB) and Unilever (UL) represent stalwarts in the consumer staples sector, focusing on essential household and personal care products. This comparison examines their recent market performance, strategic developments, and relative positioning amid sector rotation toward defensive names. Investors seeking stability in volatile markets or traders eyeing momentum in staples may find value in assessing how KMB's transformative acquisition stacks up against UL's global scale and margin improvements. With both delivering solid YTD gains, the analysis highlights contrasts in growth drivers, valuations, and risk profiles for informed stock comparison decisions.

KMB Overview and Recent Performance

Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB), a leading producer of personal care and consumer tissue products like Huggies and Kleenex, has navigated recent market activity with resilience. Trading around $111, the stock has gained approximately 10.5% year-to-date, supported by strong Q4 2025 results showing adjusted EPS up 24% to $1.86. A pivotal development is the approved $48.7 billion acquisition of Kenvue, expected to close in 2026, which could deliver $2.4 billion in synergies and reshape its consumer health portfolio. This has influenced sentiment, balancing growth optimism against debt and integration risks. Recent weeks saw shares rebound amid broader staples strength, with a 4.59% dividend yield enhancing appeal. Market cap stands at $37 billion, with PE at 22.93, reflecting undervaluation per some analyses.

UL Overview and Recent Performance

Unilever PLC (UL), a multinational giant in beauty, personal care, and food products including Dove and Ben & Jerry's, maintains a robust global footprint. At about $74 per share, UL has outperformed with 13.6% YTD returns, outpacing benchmarks. Full-year 2025 results highlighted 3.5% underlying sales growth, 1.5% volume increase, and operating margin expansion to 20%, aided by the ice cream unit spin-off and productivity gains. Recent initiatives include a new CIO appointment and Google Cloud AI partnership for digital transformation. With $161 billion market cap, PE of 24.10, and 3.01% yield, sentiment reflects steady execution despite currency headwinds. Shares have shown resilience in recent trading, buoyed by emerging market exposure.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates the platform's top-performing AI trading bots from hundreds available, each deploying distinct strategies across thousands of tickers. These bots excel in current conditions, showcasing annualized returns up to 246%, win rates of 70-95%, and profit factors reaching 12.5 in sectors like semiconductors, aerospace, and infrastructure. For instance, semiconductor-focused agents deliver 90-115% returns with 70%+ win rates, while multi-ticker strategies in volatility and ETFs post 50-120% gains. Timeframes range from 5-minute intraday to 60-minute swings, catering to diverse risk appetites. This dynamic selection highlights bots adapting to momentum, rotations, and volatility. Traders can explore these high-conviction options to enhance strategies in today's market.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Both KMB and UL operate in household and personal care, but differ in scale and drivers: UL's $60B revenue dwarfs KMB's $20B, enabling broader emerging market growth. KMB counters with the Kenvue deal for health expansion, while UL focuses on portfolio streamlining like ice cream demerger. Recent momentum favors UL YTD, but KMB leads in dividend yield and profit-risk metrics. Risks include KMB's acquisition debt versus UL's FX exposure. Sentiment tilts toward KMB for value in staples rotation, with Tickeron noting its superior short-term technicals.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors KMB over UL for its stronger short-term technical signals (5 bullish vs. 4), superior profit vs. risk rating (98 vs. 46), and acquisition catalyst amid staples momentum. While both rate StrongBuy long-term, KMB's undervaluation, higher yield, and trend consistency position it probabilistically better for near-term relative outperformance, barring integration setbacks.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.

VS
KMB vs. UL commentary
May 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KMB is a Hold and UL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 15, 2026
Stock price -- (KMB: $96.67 vs. UL: $57.34)
Brand notoriety: KMB and UL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Household/Personal Care industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KMB: 71% vs. UL: 68%
Market capitalization -- KMB: $32.09B vs. UL: $124.88B
KMB [@Household/Personal Care] is valued at $32.09B. UL’s [@Household/Personal Care] market capitalization is $124.88B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Household/Personal Care] industry ranges from $332.31B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Household/Personal Care] industry is $20.12B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KMB’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileUL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • KMB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • UL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, KMB is a better buy in the long-term than UL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KMB’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • KMB’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • UL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, UL is a better buy in the short-term than KMB.

Price Growth

KMB (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а -2.90% price change this week, while UL (@Household/Personal Care) price change was -2.37% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was -2.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.29%.

Reported Earning Dates

KMB is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Household/Personal Care (-2.58% weekly)

Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UL($125B) has a higher market cap than KMB($32.1B). UL (18.87) and KMB (18.70) have similar P/E ratio . KMB YTD gains are higher at: -2.999 vs. UL (-11.655). UL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 11.3B vs. KMB (3.21B). UL has higher revenues than KMB: UL (59.8B) vs KMB (16.6B).
KMBULKMB / UL
Capitalization32.1B125B26%
EBITDA3.21B11.3B28%
Gain YTD-2.999-11.65526%
P/E Ratio18.7018.8799%
Revenue16.6B59.8B28%
Total Cash542MN/A-
Total Debt7.08BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KMB vs UL: Fundamental Ratings
KMB
UL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7365
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
15
Undervalued
39
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10092
SMR RATING
1..100
1197
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6178
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4774
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5048

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KMB's Valuation (15) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as UL (39). This means that KMB’s stock grew similarly to UL’s over the last 12 months.

UL's Profit vs Risk Rating (92) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as KMB (100). This means that UL’s stock grew similarly to KMB’s over the last 12 months.

KMB's SMR Rating (11) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is significantly better than the same rating for UL (97). This means that KMB’s stock grew significantly faster than UL’s over the last 12 months.

KMB's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as UL (78). This means that KMB’s stock grew similarly to UL’s over the last 12 months.

KMB's P/E Growth Rating (47) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as UL (74). This means that KMB’s stock grew similarly to UL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KMBUL
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
40%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
41%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
28%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
KMB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
UL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TDIV112.901.29
+1.15%
First Trust NASDAQ Technology Div ETF
RSMR23.000.05
+0.23%
FT Vest U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - March
OASC33.610.04
+0.11%
OneAscent Enhanced Small and Mid Cap ETF
BUXX20.23N/A
N/A
Strive Enhanced Income Short MaturityETF
BITI21.44-0.53
-2.41%
ProShares Shrt Bitcoin ETF