Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KMKCX vs PEMGX
KMKCX vs PEMGX Comparison
Open Charts KMKCX vs PEMGX
KMKCX vs PEMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KMKCX vs. PEMGX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KMKCX is a Buy and PEMGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PEMGX has more cash in the bank: 23.7B vs. KMKCX (292M). KMKCX pays higher dividends than PEMGX: KMKCX (0.10) vs PEMGX (0.00). KMKCX was incepted earlier than PEMGX: KMKCX (19 years) vs PEMGX (21 years). KMKCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than PEMGX (0.90). PEMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 13.70 vs. KMKCX (4.00). PEMGX has a lower initial minimum investment than KMKCX: PEMGX (1000) vs KMKCX (2500). KMKCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.57 vs. PEMGX (-13.38). KMKCX return over 5 years is better than : 100.84 vs. PEMGX (-2.33).
| KMKCX | PEMGX | KMKCX / PEMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.15 | 0.90 | 239% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 0.90 | 270% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.290 | -4.297 | -309% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 292M | 23.7B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.10 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.57 | -13.38 | -12% |
| Returns for 3 years | 126.91 | 11.31 | 1,122% |
| Returns for 5 years | 100.84 | -2.33 | -4,327% |
| Returns for 10 years | 400.11 | 77.19 | 518% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement