KMT
Price
$31.23
Change
+$0.85 (+2.80%)
Updated
Aug 14, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.38B
80 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TNC
Price
$68.66
Change
+$1.02 (+1.51%)
Updated
Aug 14, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.17B
81 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

KMT vs TNC

KMT vs TNC Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Jul 30, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Kennametal (KMT) vs. Tennant (TNC) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Kennametal (KMT) is riding a powerful tungsten pricing tailwind that has driven 22% revenue growth and a sharp earnings beat in its most recent quarter, but free cash flow has turned negative as inventory costs surge.
  • Tennant (TNC) continues to recover from a disruptive ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning) system rollout in North America that crushed near-term profitability, yet order momentum and robotics growth point to a significant rebound ahead.
  • Analyst sentiment diverges meaningfully: KMT carries a consensus "Reduce" rating with multiple downgrades, while TNC holds a "Moderate Buy" consensus with a price target implying further upside.
  • Both companies face tariff and inflation pressures, but KMT's exposure to tungsten supply-chain dynamics introduces a unique commodity-driven risk factor not present for TNC.
  • KMT offers a higher dividend yield (approximately 2.3%) and a lower trailing P/E (price-to-earnings) ratio, while TNC trades at a premium multiple that reflects expectations of margin recovery.
  • Short interest is elevated for both stocks, indicating significant skepticism from market participants on each side of this comparison.

Introduction

Comparing KMT and TNC offers investors a window into two distinct corners of the industrial sector: advanced tooling and materials science versus mechanized and autonomous cleaning equipment. Both companies are deeply tied to the health of global manufacturing, commercial activity, and capital spending cycles, yet they are navigating very different operational challenges in the current market environment. This comparison is particularly relevant for industrials-focused investors weighing a cyclical commodity beneficiary against a technology-driven turnaround story. Understanding where each company stands — and what catalysts could reshape their trajectories — can help clarify the risk-reward equation in a landscape shaped by tariffs, supply-chain disruptions, and evolving end-market demand.

KMT Overview and Recent Performance

KMT, or Kennametal Inc., is a Pittsburgh-based industrial technology company that designs and manufactures advanced tooling systems, wear-resistant engineered components, and metallurgical powders. Serving end markets that include aerospace, defense, energy, general engineering, and earthworks, the company operates through two segments: Metal Cutting and Infrastructure. With a market capitalization of approximately $2.7 billion and a history spanning more than 85 years, Kennametal occupies a well-established niche in precision metalworking and hard-material applications.

In recent months, Kennametal has delivered some of its strongest financial results in years. For its fiscal third quarter of 2026 (ended March 31, 2026), the company reported sales of $593 million, reflecting a 22% increase year over year and a 19% organic growth rate. Adjusted earnings per share reached $0.77, up 65% from the prior-year period and comfortably above the consensus analyst estimate of $0.68. The standout driver has been the unprecedented rise in tungsten prices — a key raw material — which surged from roughly $900 per metric ton to approximately $3,000 due to constrained global supply and export controls. Kennametal's vertically integrated supply chain has allowed it to capture favorable pricing timing while competitors struggled with availability.

Despite the top- and bottom-line strength, the stock has pulled back meaningfully from its 52-week high near $43.81, trading more recently in the mid-$30s. Several Wall Street firms — including Morgan Stanley, Barclays, and JPMorgan — have downgraded the stock or reduced price targets, citing concerns about the sustainability of commodity-driven earnings, rising working capital requirements, and a sharp decline in free operating cash flow. Year-to-date free cash flow fell to $18 million from $63 million in the prior-year period, largely because of inventory buildup tied to expensive tungsten. Insider selling — totaling approximately 47,000 shares over the trailing 90-day period — has added to cautious sentiment. Still, Kennametal raised its full-year fiscal 2026 revenue outlook to $2.33–$2.35 billion and its adjusted EPS guidance to $3.75–$4.00, signaling management's confidence that pricing strength and volume momentum can persist.

TNC Overview and Recent Performance

TNC, Tennant Company, is a Minneapolis-area manufacturer of floor cleaning equipment, including manual scrubbers, sweepers, and autonomous mobile robots (AMRs) used in warehouses, retail environments, hospitals, and manufacturing facilities. With a market capitalization near $1.5 billion, the company sells through a direct network across 21 countries and through distributors in over 100 others. A key differentiator for Tennant is its growing robotics segment, which leverages autonomous navigation technology — including an exclusive partnership with Brain Corp extended through 2029 — to target a $250 million robotics revenue goal by 2028.

Tennant's recent performance has been defined by a high-stakes operational crisis. In November 2025, the company launched a new ERP system in North America, and the rollout caused severe disruptions. For a period, Tennant was unable to process and ship customer orders. Management later disclosed that the disruption cost approximately $30 million in lost sales and that more than $20 million would be required for remediation in 2026. The February 2026 disclosure triggered a 23% single-day stock decline, and the episode prompted securities fraud investigations by multiple law firms regarding the company's prior public statements about the ERP project's progress.

The most recent quarterly results, however, suggest the recovery is on track. In the first quarter of 2026, Tennant reported net sales of $297.9 million (up 2.7% year over year), while adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) of $29.1 million exceeded internal expectations despite being down sharply from the prior year's $41 million. Perhaps most encouraging, orders grew 10% year over year to $327 million, and the autonomous mobile robot (AMR) business expanded by 85%, now representing roughly 9% of total sales. Gross margins, which fell to 38.1% during the quarter because of ERP-related inefficiencies, exited March at approximately 40%, supporting management's narrative of progressive recovery. The company deployed roughly $60 million in share repurchases during the quarter — approximately 5% of shares outstanding — which it described as a high-conviction response to event-driven price dislocation. Full-year 2026 guidance calls for $1.24–$1.28 billion in sales and adjusted EPS of $4.70–$5.30.

Trending AI Robots

In an environment where industrial stocks face cross-currents from tariffs, commodity price swings, and operational disruptions, traders are increasingly turning to algorithm-driven tools for guidance. Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page curates a selection of the platform's most compelling AI trading bots from a universe of hundreds, each designed to trade across thousands of different tickers using distinct strategies, timeframes, and risk parameters. These bots are not simply listed at random — only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with current market conditions earn a place in this curated section. Performance statistics available on the platform show bots with annualized returns in a wide range, reflecting varied trading styles from high-frequency pattern recognition to longer-duration trend following, with some bots achieving Sharpe ratios above 2.0 and win rates exceeding 70%. Whether you are monitoring turnaround narratives like TNC or commodity-driven momentum plays like KMT, exploring how AI-powered algorithms evaluate and act on these tickers can add a valuable quantitative lens to your decision-making process.

Head-to-Head Comparison

While both KMT and TNC operate within the broad industrials sector, the comparison reveals fundamentally different investment profiles shaped by business model, risk exposure, and near-term catalysts.

Business Model and Revenue Drivers: Kennametal generates the majority of its revenue from consumable metal-cutting tools and wear-resistant components — products that customers must replenish regularly, creating a degree of recurring demand. Its infrastructure segment is tied to mining, construction, and energy activity. Tennant, by contrast, sells capital equipment (floor scrubbers, sweepers, and autonomous robots) together with aftermarket parts and service contracts. The robotics and autonomous cleaning segment offers a growth vector that has no direct parallel in Kennametal's portfolio.

Margin Profiles and Profitability: Kennametal's trailing operating margin of approximately 13.5% handily exceeds Tennant's heavily compressed sub-2% trailing operating margin, though much of KMT's recent margin expansion stems from the temporary timing benefit of tungsten pricing rather than structural improvement. Tennant's margins, severely depressed by ERP-related costs, are expected to recover toward a 14–15% adjusted EBITDA margin range by year-end, implying significant sequential improvement.

Balance Sheet and Cash Flow: Kennametal holds a debt-to-equity ratio of approximately 0.43 and a current ratio of 2.38, suggesting a solid liquidity position. However, working capital pressures from rising tungsten inventory costs caused free cash flow to decline sharply. Tennant carries a higher debt-to-equity ratio of about 0.74 and a current ratio of 2.12. Its cash flow was also pressured, but the aggressive share buyback signals management conviction in the intrinsic value of the business.

Sentiment and Valuation: This is where the two stories diverge most starkly. KMT trades at roughly 20 times trailing earnings and offers a 2.3% dividend yield, yet Wall Street analysts have soured — the consensus rating sits at "Reduce" with an average price target near $35.79, implying limited upside. TNC trades at a much higher trailing P/E (above 50) due to compressed EPS, but the forward P/E of approximately 15–18 based on guided earnings suggests substantial recovery is already anticipated. The analyst consensus for TNC is "Moderate Buy" with a target around $91–$93.50, reflecting a more optimistic outlook. Short interest as a percentage of float is elevated for both — approximately 12.6% for KMT and 8.4% for TNC — indicating that bearish bets are present on both sides of this comparison.

Risk Factors: For KMT, the primary risk is the sustainability of tungsten pricing. Should global supply normalize or demand weaken, the earnings tailwind could reverse, and elevated inventory values could become a liability. For TNC, execution risk around ERP optimization remains the dominant concern, alongside litigation risk from the securities fraud investigations. Both companies face tariff and inflation headwinds, though each has demonstrated pricing power to partially offset these pressures.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable trend characteristics, relative positioning, and catalyst profiles, Tickeron's AI analytical framework would likely express a measured preference for TNC over KMT in the current environment. While Kennametal's recent earnings momentum is undeniably strong, the trend carries a commodity-driven quality that introduces unpredictability — tungsten prices have been historically volatile, and the company's own cash flow metrics reveal the strain beneath the surface. Multiple analyst downgrades, insider selling, and elevated short interest collectively suggest that the market is questioning how much of KMT's outperformance is repeatable. Tennant, on the other hand, presents a more asymmetric setup: the ERP disruption created a clear, identifiable event-driven dislocation, and the improving monthly margin trajectory, 10% order growth, 85% robotics expansion, and aggressive share buyback activity all point toward a recovery that may not yet be fully discounted. The AI would likely view TNC's improving operational consistency, secular robotics tailwind, and more favorable Wall Street consensus as factors that tilt the probabilistic balance in its favor — without ignoring the very real execution and litigation risks that remain in play.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
KMT vs. TNC commentary
Aug 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KMT is a StrongBuy and TNC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 15, 2026
Stock price -- (KMT: $30.38 vs. TNC: $67.64)
Brand notoriety: KMT and TNC are both not notable
KMT represents the Tools & Hardware, while TNC is part of the Industrial Machinery industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KMT: 141% vs. TNC: 158%
Market capitalization -- KMT: $2.38B vs. TNC: $1.17B
KMT [@Tools & Hardware] is valued at $2.38B. TNC’s [@Industrial Machinery] market capitalization is $1.17B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Tools & Hardware] industry ranges from $29.1B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Industrial Machinery] industry ranges from $283.18B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Tools & Hardware] industry is $9.19B. The average market capitalization across the [@Industrial Machinery] industry is $17.23B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KMT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTNC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • KMT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TNC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, TNC is a better buy in the long-term than KMT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KMT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TNC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • KMT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • TNC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TNC is a better buy in the short-term than KMT.

Price Growth

KMT (@Tools & Hardware) experienced а -9.68% price change this week, while TNC (@Industrial Machinery) price change was -12.04% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Tools & Hardware industry was -1.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.02%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was +0.99%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.55%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.18%.

Reported Earning Dates

KMT is expected to report earnings on Nov 02, 2026.

TNC is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Tools & Hardware (-1.67% weekly)

Tools & Hardware industry includes companies that manufacture security products, storage cabinets, steel rules and tapes, calipers, shoe hook fasteners, lumber, structural materials and other related supplies. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc., Snap-on Incorporated and L.S. Starrett Company are some of the largest, established players in this industry. The industry is also seeing rapid growth in online sales. The proliferation of do-it-yourself (DIY) projects has boosted industry demand. But oil price volatility poses potential risks to this industry, particularly to e-commerce companies which spend on services of shipping companies, which might alter charges based on oil price movements.

@Industrial Machinery (+0.99% weekly)

The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KMT($2.38B) has a higher market cap than TNC($1.17B). TNC has higher P/E ratio than KMT: TNC (65.95) vs KMT (7.06). KMT YTD gains are higher at: 8.733 vs. TNC (-7.436). KMT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 360M vs. TNC (111M). TNC has less debt than KMT: TNC (392M) vs KMT (660M). KMT has higher revenues than TNC: KMT (2.14B) vs TNC (1.21B).
KMTTNCKMT / TNC
Capitalization2.38B1.17B204%
EBITDA360M111M324%
Gain YTD8.733-7.436-117%
P/E Ratio7.0665.9511%
Revenue2.14B1.21B176%
Total CashN/A82.6M-
Total Debt660M392M168%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KMT vs TNC: Fundamental Ratings
KMT
TNC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6859
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
5
Undervalued
30
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
94100
SMR RATING
1..100
7085
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6077
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
976
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7565

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KMT's Valuation (5) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as TNC (30). This means that KMT’s stock grew similarly to TNC’s over the last 12 months.

KMT's Profit vs Risk Rating (94) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as TNC (100). This means that KMT’s stock grew similarly to TNC’s over the last 12 months.

KMT's SMR Rating (70) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as TNC (85). This means that KMT’s stock grew similarly to TNC’s over the last 12 months.

KMT's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as TNC (77). This means that KMT’s stock grew similarly to TNC’s over the last 12 months.

TNC's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the Industrial Machinery industry is significantly better than the same rating for KMT (97). This means that TNC’s stock grew significantly faster than KMT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KMTTNC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
KMT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TNC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ANWFX76.970.71
+0.93%
American Funds New Perspective F-2
CIAOX56.01N/A
N/A
Capital Advisors Growth Investor
MWEBX36.71N/A
N/A
MFS Global Equity B
DTEYX112.73N/A
N/A
BNY Mellon Technology Growth Y
JHDRX21.75N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Hedged Equity 2 R6

KMT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KMT has been closely correlated with HLIO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KMT jumps, then HLIO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KMT
1D Price
Change %
KMT100%
-1.30%
HLIO - KMT
70%
Closely correlated
+0.40%
MIDD - KMT
69%
Closely correlated
-1.62%
TNC - KMT
68%
Closely correlated
-2.32%
SXI - KMT
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.83%
WTS - KMT
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.86%
More

TNC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TNC has been closely correlated with LECO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TNC jumps, then LECO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TNC
1D Price
Change %
TNC100%
-2.32%
LECO - TNC
68%
Closely correlated
-0.82%
HLMN - TNC
65%
Loosely correlated
-1.23%
SWK - TNC
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.67%
KMT - TNC
60%
Loosely correlated
-1.30%
SNA - TNC
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.93%
More