| KNG | SCLZ | KNG / SCLZ | |
| Gain YTD | 8.698 | 5.194 | 167% |
| Net Assets | 3.53B | 17.9M | 19,743% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.79 | 94% |
| Turnover | 152.00 | 4.00 | 3,800% |
| Yield | 6.09 | 7.47 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 2 years | - |
| KNG | SCLZ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 70% | 4 days ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 67% | 4 days ago 65% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 54% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 57% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 84% | 25 days ago 75% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% | 6 days ago 51% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 85% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KNG has been closely correlated with ITW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KNG jumps, then ITW could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that SCLZ and YUM have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SCLZ and YUM's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCLZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCLZ | 100% | N/A | ||
| YUM - SCLZ | 17% Poorly correlated | -2.37% | ||
| ADP - SCLZ | 13% Poorly correlated | +0.98% | ||
| MCD - SCLZ | 10% Poorly correlated | +0.82% | ||
| UNH - SCLZ | 10% Poorly correlated | -1.68% | ||
| CTSH - SCLZ | 10% Poorly correlated | +2.70% | ||
More | ||||