KRNY
Price
$6.87
Change
-$0.02 (-0.29%)
Updated
Nov 28 closing price
Capitalization
431.66M
53 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PFS
Price
$19.18
Change
-$0.07 (-0.36%)
Updated
Nov 28 closing price
Capitalization
2.51B
54 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

KRNY vs PFS

Header iconKRNY vs PFS Comparison
Open Charts KRNY vs PFSBanner chart's image
Kearny Financial
Price$6.87
Change-$0.02 (-0.29%)
Volume$89.11K
Capitalization431.66M
Provident Financial Services
Price$19.18
Change-$0.07 (-0.36%)
Volume$546.36K
Capitalization2.51B
KRNY vs PFS Comparison Chart in %
KRNY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PFS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KRNY vs. PFS commentary
Nov 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KRNY is a StrongBuy and PFS is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 30, 2025
Stock price -- (KRNY: $6.87 vs. PFS: $19.18)
Brand notoriety: KRNY and PFS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KRNY: 24% vs. PFS: 78%
Market capitalization -- KRNY: $431.66M vs. PFS: $2.51B
KRNY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $431.66M. PFS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $2.51B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $173.44B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.22B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KRNY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePFS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • KRNY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PFS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, KRNY is a better buy in the long-term than PFS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KRNY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PFS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • KRNY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PFS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both KRNY and PFS are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

KRNY (@Regional Banks) experienced а +3.15% price change this week, while PFS (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.59% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.68%.

Reported Earning Dates

KRNY is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2026.

PFS is expected to report earnings on Jan 23, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.67% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PFS($2.51B) has a higher market cap than KRNY($432M). KRNY has higher P/E ratio than PFS: KRNY (14.62) vs PFS (9.64). PFS YTD gains are higher at: 7.036 vs. KRNY (3.878). PFS has more cash in the bank: 259M vs. KRNY (21.9M). KRNY has less debt than PFS: KRNY (1.26B) vs PFS (2.68B). PFS has higher revenues than KRNY: PFS (851M) vs KRNY (154M).
KRNYPFSKRNY / PFS
Capitalization432M2.51B17%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD3.8787.03655%
P/E Ratio14.629.64152%
Revenue154M851M18%
Total Cash21.9M259M8%
Total Debt1.26B2.68B47%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KRNY vs PFS: Fundamental Ratings
KRNY
PFS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
308
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
30
Undervalued
18
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9649
SMR RATING
1..100
4714
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4952
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4394
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PFS's Valuation (18) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as KRNY (30). This means that PFS’s stock grew similarly to KRNY’s over the last 12 months.

PFS's Profit vs Risk Rating (49) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KRNY (96). This means that PFS’s stock grew somewhat faster than KRNY’s over the last 12 months.

PFS's SMR Rating (14) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KRNY (47). This means that PFS’s stock grew somewhat faster than KRNY’s over the last 12 months.

KRNY's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as PFS (52). This means that KRNY’s stock grew similarly to PFS’s over the last 12 months.

KRNY's P/E Growth Rating (43) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PFS (94). This means that KRNY’s stock grew somewhat faster than PFS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KRNYPFS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
56%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
KRNY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PFS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BSGLX38.790.32
+0.83%
Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Gr I
ADECX19.140.12
+0.63%
Columbia Intrinsic Value C
HDGIX37.860.23
+0.61%
Hartford Dividend and Growth I
AUXAX34.400.18
+0.53%
Auxier Focus A
JGQIX18.520.05
+0.27%
Jensen Global Quality Growth I

KRNY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KRNY has been closely correlated with CTBI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KRNY jumps, then CTBI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KRNY
1D Price
Change %
KRNY100%
-0.29%
CTBI - KRNY
79%
Closely correlated
-0.61%
UVSP - KRNY
79%
Closely correlated
-0.50%
STEL - KRNY
79%
Closely correlated
-0.22%
HOPE - KRNY
78%
Closely correlated
-0.84%
PFS - KRNY
78%
Closely correlated
-0.36%
More

PFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PFS has been closely correlated with FFBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PFS jumps, then FFBC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PFS
1D Price
Change %
PFS100%
-0.36%
FFBC - PFS
89%
Closely correlated
-0.72%
UCB - PFS
88%
Closely correlated
-1.20%
AX - PFS
87%
Closely correlated
+0.23%
WSFS - PFS
87%
Closely correlated
-1.05%
HOPE - PFS
87%
Closely correlated
-0.84%
More