KROEF
Price
$0.50
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
100.12M
VINP
Price
$10.15
Change
+$0.11 (+1.10%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
641.93M
60 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

KROEF vs VINP

Header iconKROEF vs VINP Comparison
Open Charts KROEF vs VINPBanner chart's image
KR1
Price$0.50
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$10K
Capitalization100.12M
Vinci Compass Investments
Price$10.15
Change+$0.11 (+1.10%)
Volume$15.19K
Capitalization641.93M
KROEF vs VINP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
KROEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VINP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KROEF vs. VINP commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KROEF is a Hold and VINP is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (KROEF: $0.50 vs. VINP: $10.15)
Brand notoriety: KROEF and VINP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KROEF: 30% vs. VINP: 34%
Market capitalization -- KROEF: $100.12M vs. VINP: $641.93M
KROEF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $100.12M. VINP’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $641.93M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $170.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.5B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KROEF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileVINP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • KROEF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • VINP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, VINP is a better buy in the long-term than KROEF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KROEF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VINP’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • KROEF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • VINP’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, VINP is a better buy in the short-term than KROEF.

Price Growth

KROEF (@Investment Managers) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while VINP (@Investment Managers) price change was +0.89% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.27%.

Reported Earning Dates

VINP is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.32% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VINP($642M) has a higher market cap than KROEF($100M). VINP has higher P/E ratio than KROEF: VINP (20.65) vs KROEF (8.39). VINP YTD gains are higher at: 5.559 vs. KROEF (-28.643).
KROEFVINPKROEF / VINP
Capitalization100M642M16%
EBITDAN/A332M-
Gain YTD-28.6435.559-515%
P/E Ratio8.3920.6541%
RevenueN/A910M-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KROEFVINP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
KROEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VINP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ELRNF2.380.25
+11.74%
Elron Ventures Ltd.
MCQEF141.94N/A
N/A
Macquarie Group, Ltd.
FRIVF0.53N/A
N/A
Fortune Real Estate Investment Trust
KNCRY16.70N/A
N/A
Konecranes Plc
GBMCF0.12N/A
N/A
Green Bridge Metals Corporation

KROEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KROEF and GECC have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KROEF and GECC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KROEF
1D Price
Change %
KROEF100%
N/A
GECC - KROEF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.36%
BTGGF - KROEF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PAX - KROEF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AGNMF - KROEF
9%
Poorly correlated
-6.38%
VINP - KROEF
7%
Poorly correlated
+1.10%
More

VINP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VINP has been loosely correlated with PAX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VINP jumps, then PAX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VINP
1D Price
Change %
VINP100%
+1.10%
PAX - VINP
61%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BN - VINP
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.08%
SEIC - VINP
58%
Loosely correlated
-2.30%
TROW - VINP
55%
Loosely correlated
-3.01%
BAM - VINP
55%
Loosely correlated
-1.25%
More