KROP vs SMG
Loading...
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KROP is a Buy and SMG is a Hold.
SMG | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 11 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 46 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 86 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| KROP | SMG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 68% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 57% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 68% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 6 days ago 66% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 90% | 14 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 55% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 74% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| UCIB | 26.75 | 0.34 | +1.29% |
| UBS ETRACS BgCstMtCdy(CMCI)TtlRetETNSerB | |||
| SHYD | 22.40 | 0.10 | +0.45% |
| VanEck Short High Yield Muni ETF | |||
| MPAY | 23.67 | 0.07 | +0.30% |
| Akros Monthly Payout ETF | |||
| BUXX | 20.25 | 0.01 | +0.05% |
| Strive Enhanced Income Short MaturityETF | |||
| FXD | 60.56 | -0.19 | -0.32% |
| First Trust Cnsmr Discret AlphaDEX® ETF | |||
KROP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KROP has been loosely correlated with NTR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KROP jumps, then NTR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KROP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KROP | 100% | +1.30% | ||
| NTR - KROP | 57% Loosely correlated | +2.31% | ||
| CTVA - KROP | 55% Loosely correlated | +2.06% | ||
| SMG - KROP | 52% Loosely correlated | -3.11% | ||
| FMC - KROP | 51% Loosely correlated | +9.46% | ||
| CNHI - KROP | 50% Loosely correlated | +2.76% | ||
More | ||||
SMG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMG has been loosely correlated with ICL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SMG jumps, then ICL could also see price increases.