KRUS
Price
$79.72
Change
-$3.41 (-4.10%)
Updated
Aug 8, 10:41 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.02B
89 days until earnings call
SHAK
Price
$109.25
Change
-$2.91 (-2.59%)
Updated
Aug 8, 10:55 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.51B
83 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

KRUS vs SHAK

Header iconKRUS vs SHAK Comparison
Open Charts KRUS vs SHAKBanner chart's image
Kura Sushi USA
Price$79.72
Change-$3.41 (-4.10%)
Volume$595
Capitalization1.02B
Shake Shack
Price$109.25
Change-$2.91 (-2.59%)
Volume$400
Capitalization4.51B
KRUS vs SHAK Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
KRUS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SHAK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KRUS vs. SHAK commentary
Aug 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KRUS is a Hold and SHAK is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 08, 2025
Stock price -- (KRUS: $83.13 vs. SHAK: $112.16)
Brand notoriety: KRUS: Not notable vs. SHAK: Notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KRUS: 81% vs. SHAK: 71%
Market capitalization -- KRUS: $1.02B vs. SHAK: $4.51B
KRUS [@Restaurants] is valued at $1.02B. SHAK’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $4.51B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $219.73B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KRUS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSHAK’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • KRUS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SHAK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, KRUS is a better buy in the long-term than SHAK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KRUS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SHAK’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • KRUS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SHAK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, KRUS is a better buy in the short-term than SHAK.

Price Growth

KRUS (@Restaurants) experienced а -5.25% price change this week, while SHAK (@Restaurants) price change was -6.80% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -0.65%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was -11.55%.

Reported Earning Dates

KRUS is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

SHAK is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-0.65% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHAK($4.51B) has a higher market cap than KRUS($1.02B). KRUS has higher P/E ratio than SHAK: KRUS (292.35) vs SHAK (238.64). KRUS YTD gains are higher at: -8.225 vs. SHAK (-13.590). SHAK has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 137M vs. KRUS (4.17M). SHAK has more cash in the bank: 337M vs. KRUS (60M). KRUS has less debt than SHAK: KRUS (166M) vs SHAK (838M). SHAK has higher revenues than KRUS: SHAK (1.32B) vs KRUS (269M).
KRUSSHAKKRUS / SHAK
Capitalization1.02B4.51B23%
EBITDA4.17M137M3%
Gain YTD-8.225-13.59061%
P/E Ratio292.35238.64123%
Revenue269M1.32B20%
Total Cash60M337M18%
Total Debt166M838M20%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KRUS vs SHAK: Fundamental Ratings
KRUS
SHAK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5652
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
99
Overvalued
96
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4654
SMR RATING
1..100
9285
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4261
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10016
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SHAK's Valuation (96) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as KRUS (99) in the null industry. This means that SHAK’s stock grew similarly to KRUS’s over the last 12 months.

KRUS's Profit vs Risk Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as SHAK (54) in the Restaurants industry. This means that KRUS’s stock grew similarly to SHAK’s over the last 12 months.

SHAK's SMR Rating (85) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as KRUS (92) in the null industry. This means that SHAK’s stock grew similarly to KRUS’s over the last 12 months.

KRUS's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as SHAK (61) in the Restaurants industry. This means that KRUS’s stock grew similarly to SHAK’s over the last 12 months.

SHAK's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for KRUS (100) in the null industry. This means that SHAK’s stock grew significantly faster than KRUS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KRUSSHAK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
KRUS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SHAK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MIDHX32.79N/A
N/A
MFS International New Discovery R3
PSGIX21.81N/A
N/A
BlackRock Advantage Small Cap Gr Instl
MFMPX17.38N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Inst Next Gen Em Mkts A
SREQX13.17N/A
N/A
PGIM Select Real Estate R6
BMSDX14.47N/A
N/A
MFS Blended Research Mid Cap Eq C

KRUS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KRUS has been loosely correlated with CAKE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KRUS jumps, then CAKE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KRUS
1D Price
Change %
KRUS100%
-1.53%
CAKE - KRUS
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.29%
RICK - KRUS
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.34%
SHAK - KRUS
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.72%
TXRH - KRUS
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.35%
BJRI - KRUS
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.03%
More

SHAK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SHAK has been loosely correlated with FRSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SHAK jumps, then FRSH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SHAK
1D Price
Change %
SHAK100%
-0.72%
FRSH - SHAK
57%
Loosely correlated
-2.78%
CAKE - SHAK
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.29%
TXRH - SHAK
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.35%
CAVA - SHAK
53%
Loosely correlated
+3.18%
EAT - SHAK
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.25%
More