KSSRF
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.01 (-33.33%)
Updated
Dec 9 closing price
STBMF
Price
$0.20
Change
-$0.01 (-4.76%)
Updated
Dec 9 closing price
Ad is loading...

KSSRF vs STBMF

Header iconKSSRF vs STBMF Comparison
Open Charts KSSRF vs STBMFBanner chart's image
Kesselrun Resources
Price$0.02
Change-$0.01 (-33.33%)
Volume$2K
CapitalizationN/A
St. Barbara
Price$0.20
Change-$0.01 (-4.76%)
Volume$1.91K
CapitalizationN/A
KSSRF vs STBMF Comparison Chart
Loading...
KSSRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
STBMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KSSRF vs. STBMF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KSSRF is a Hold and STBMF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (KSSRF: $0.02 vs. STBMF: $0.20)
Brand notoriety: KSSRF and STBMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KSSRF: 18% vs. STBMF: 21%
Market capitalization -- KSSRF: $2.12M vs. STBMF: $93.29M
KSSRF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $2.12M. STBMF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $93.29M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KSSRF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSTBMF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • KSSRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • STBMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, STBMF is a better buy in the long-term than KSSRF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KSSRF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while STBMF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • KSSRF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • STBMF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, KSSRF is a better buy in the short-term than STBMF.

Price Growth

KSSRF (@Precious Metals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while STBMF (@Precious Metals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -5.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.01%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-5.24% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
STBMF($93.3M) has a higher market cap than KSSRF($2.12M). STBMF YTD gains are higher at: 96.271 vs. KSSRF (-17.000). KSSRF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -97.26K vs. STBMF (-28.54M). STBMF has more cash in the bank: 294M vs. KSSRF (827K). KSSRF has less debt than STBMF: KSSRF (124K) vs STBMF (12.9M). STBMF has higher revenues than KSSRF: STBMF (110M) vs KSSRF (0).
KSSRFSTBMFKSSRF / STBMF
Capitalization2.12M93.3M2%
EBITDA-97.26K-28.54M0%
Gain YTD-17.00096.271-18%
P/E Ratio33.33N/A-
Revenue0110M-
Total Cash827K294M0%
Total Debt124K12.9M1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KSSRF vs STBMF: Fundamental Ratings
KSSRF
STBMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2789
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
91
Overvalued
7
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
97100
SMR RATING
1..100
9093
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6538
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
496
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a48

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

STBMF's Valuation (7) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for KSSRF (91). This means that STBMF’s stock grew significantly faster than KSSRF’s over the last 12 months.

KSSRF's Profit vs Risk Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as STBMF (100). This means that KSSRF’s stock grew similarly to STBMF’s over the last 12 months.

KSSRF's SMR Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as STBMF (93). This means that KSSRF’s stock grew similarly to STBMF’s over the last 12 months.

STBMF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as KSSRF (65). This means that STBMF’s stock grew similarly to KSSRF’s over the last 12 months.

KSSRF's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for STBMF (96). This means that KSSRF’s stock grew significantly faster than STBMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KSSRFSTBMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
84%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
KSSRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
STBMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NBIX136.693.64
+2.74%
Neurocrine Biosciences
SNGX3.02-0.03
-0.99%
Soligenix Inc.
USAC22.13-0.28
-1.25%
USA Compression Partners LP
XTNT0.35-0.01
-2.07%
Xtant Medical Holdings
TRDA17.10-1.35
-7.32%
Entrada Therapeutics

KSSRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KSSRF and STBMF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KSSRF and STBMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KSSRF
1D Price
Change %
KSSRF100%
N/A
STBMF - KSSRF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FNMCF - KSSRF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.04%
LOMLF - KSSRF
21%
Poorly correlated
+7.60%
KOREF - KSSRF
14%
Poorly correlated
-5.13%
LBCMF - KSSRF
3%
Poorly correlated
-2.83%
More

STBMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, STBMF has been loosely correlated with GLBKF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if STBMF jumps, then GLBKF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To STBMF
1D Price
Change %
STBMF100%
N/A
GLBKF - STBMF
50%
Loosely correlated
N/A
GSISF - STBMF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TDRRF - STBMF
28%
Poorly correlated
-4.41%
KSSRF - STBMF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ELRRF - STBMF
26%
Poorly correlated
-4.03%
More