KSSRF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 26 closing price
Capitalization
3.06M
STBMF
Price
$0.23
Change
+$0.06 (+35.29%)
Updated
Aug 25 closing price
Capitalization
253.4M
Interact to see
Advertisement

KSSRF vs STBMF

Header iconKSSRF vs STBMF Comparison
Open Charts KSSRF vs STBMFBanner chart's image
Kesselrun Resources
Price$0.03
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$22.5K
Capitalization3.06M
St. Barbara
Price$0.23
Change+$0.06 (+35.29%)
Volume$5K
Capitalization253.4M
KSSRF vs STBMF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
KSSRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
STBMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KSSRF vs. STBMF commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KSSRF is a Hold and STBMF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (KSSRF: $0.03 vs. STBMF: $0.23)
Brand notoriety: KSSRF and STBMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KSSRF: 200% vs. STBMF: 144%
Market capitalization -- KSSRF: $3.06M vs. STBMF: $253.4M
KSSRF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $3.06M. STBMF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $253.4M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $83.78B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.62B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KSSRF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSTBMF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • KSSRF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • STBMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, STBMF is a better buy in the long-term than KSSRF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KSSRF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while STBMF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • KSSRF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • STBMF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, STBMF is a better buy in the short-term than KSSRF.

Price Growth

KSSRF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -5.00% price change this week, while STBMF (@Precious Metals) price change was +35.29% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +6.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3316.97%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+6.27% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
STBMF($253M) has a higher market cap than KSSRF($3.06M). STBMF YTD gains are higher at: 120.307 vs. KSSRF (14.228).
KSSRFSTBMFKSSRF / STBMF
Capitalization3.06M253M1%
EBITDA-606.73KN/A-
Gain YTD14.228120.30712%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue0N/A-
Total Cash582KN/A-
Total Debt145KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KSSRF vs STBMF: Fundamental Ratings
KSSRF
STBMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8638
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
7
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6038
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

STBMF's Valuation (7) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for KSSRF (92). This means that STBMF’s stock grew significantly faster than KSSRF’s over the last 12 months.

STBMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as KSSRF (100). This means that STBMF’s stock grew similarly to KSSRF’s over the last 12 months.

STBMF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as KSSRF (100). This means that STBMF’s stock grew similarly to KSSRF’s over the last 12 months.

STBMF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as KSSRF (60). This means that STBMF’s stock grew similarly to KSSRF’s over the last 12 months.

STBMF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as KSSRF (100). This means that STBMF’s stock grew similarly to KSSRF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KSSRFSTBMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
83%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
KSSRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
STBMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FDTTX26.74N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Capital Development A
GSAOX18.12N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Gr Insghts A
SSCYX6.28N/A
N/A
Saratoga Small Capitalization A
VREMX8.38N/A
N/A
Virtus SGA Emerging Markets Equity R6
EKJAX12.38N/A
N/A
Allspring Premier Large Co Gr A

KSSRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KSSRF and STBMF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KSSRF and STBMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KSSRF
1D Price
Change %
KSSRF100%
N/A
STBMF - KSSRF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LOMLF - KSSRF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.41%
KOREF - KSSRF
14%
Poorly correlated
-24.20%
LMEFF - KSSRF
-4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KTGDF - KSSRF
-4%
Poorly correlated
-3.51%
More

STBMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, STBMF has been loosely correlated with GLBKF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if STBMF jumps, then GLBKF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To STBMF
1D Price
Change %
STBMF100%
N/A
GLBKF - STBMF
50%
Loosely correlated
N/A
GSISF - STBMF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TDRRF - STBMF
28%
Poorly correlated
+7.79%
KSSRF - STBMF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ELRRF - STBMF
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.22%
More