It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
KT’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileLBTYA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
KT’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LBTYA’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
KT (@Wireless Telecommunications) experienced а -1.28% price change this week, while LBTYA (@Wireless Telecommunications) price change was +1.97% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Wireless Telecommunications industry was +10.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +63.51%.
KT is expected to report earnings on Feb 06, 2025.
LBTYA is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2024.
Wireless Telecom includes companies that sell wireless antenna or satellite-based communication services. This is the fastest-growing area in communications, as more and more communication and computing happen on mobile devices and cloud-based platforms. Wireless telecom is a key industry for global connectivity, and has even further room for growth in emerging markets and in rural parts of developed nations. People’s growing need for speed in data connectivity, higher resolution, and smoother video streaming and multimedia applications should drive growth and competition within this segment. T-Mobile US, Inc., Vodafone Group, and Sprint Corporation are some major providers of wireless telecom.
KT | LBTYA | KT / LBTYA | |
Capitalization | 6.86B | 6.41B | 107% |
EBITDA | 5.85T | -501.1M | -1,167,033% |
Gain YTD | 16.437 | 16.714 | 98% |
P/E Ratio | 9.10 | 14.39 | 63% |
Revenue | 26.04T | 7.49B | 347,617% |
Total Cash | 3.11T | 3.41B | 91,309% |
Total Debt | 10.31T | 17.4B | 59,247% |
KT | LBTYA | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 77 | 64 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 9 Undervalued | 63 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 20 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 38 | 93 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | 47 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 28 | 1 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
KT's Valuation (9) in the Major Telecommunications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LBTYA (63) in the Cable Or Satellite TV industry. This means that KT’s stock grew somewhat faster than LBTYA’s over the last 12 months.
KT's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the Major Telecommunications industry is significantly better than the same rating for LBTYA (100) in the Cable Or Satellite TV industry. This means that KT’s stock grew significantly faster than LBTYA’s over the last 12 months.
KT's SMR Rating (38) in the Major Telecommunications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LBTYA (93) in the Cable Or Satellite TV industry. This means that KT’s stock grew somewhat faster than LBTYA’s over the last 12 months.
KT's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Major Telecommunications industry is in the same range as LBTYA (47) in the Cable Or Satellite TV industry. This means that KT’s stock grew similarly to LBTYA’s over the last 12 months.
LBTYA's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Cable Or Satellite TV industry is in the same range as KT (28) in the Major Telecommunications industry. This means that LBTYA’s stock grew similarly to KT’s over the last 12 months.
KT | LBTYA | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago47% | 1 day ago63% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago36% | 1 day ago61% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago46% | 1 day ago53% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago40% | 1 day ago58% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago60% | 1 day ago57% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago62% | 2 days ago58% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago46% | 6 days ago69% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago55% | 1 day ago55% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago56% | 1 day ago65% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LBTYA has been closely correlated with LBTYK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 98% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LBTYA jumps, then LBTYK could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LBTYA | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
LBTYA | 100% | N/A | ||
LBTYK - LBTYA | 98% Closely correlated | +0.05% | ||
IDCC - LBTYA | 51% Loosely correlated | +0.78% | ||
KT - LBTYA | 45% Loosely correlated | -1.59% | ||
S - LBTYA | 44% Loosely correlated | +1.95% | ||
LILA - LBTYA | 43% Loosely correlated | -6.84% | ||
More |