Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
KTCSX vs SLMCX
KTCSX vs SLMCX Comparison
Open Charts KTCSX vs SLMCX
KTCSX vs SLMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
KTCSX vs. SLMCX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KTCSX is a Buy and SLMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLMCX has more cash in the bank: 29.8B vs. KTCSX (2.64B). KTCSX (0.00) and SLMCX (0.00) have matching dividends . KTCSX was incepted earlier than SLMCX: KTCSX (21 years) vs SLMCX (43 years). SLMCX (1.16) is less costly to investors than KTCSX (0.68). SLMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. KTCSX (22.00). SLMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than KTCSX: SLMCX (2000) vs KTCSX (2500). SLMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 107.57 vs. KTCSX (45.17). SLMCX return over 5 years is better than : 100.65 vs. KTCSX (62.12).
| KTCSX | SLMCX | KTCSX / SLMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.16 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.16 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 43 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 29.757 | 58.653 | 51% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2000 | 125% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.64B | 29.8B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 45.17 | 107.57 | 42% |
| Returns for 3 years | 97.07 | 145.71 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 62.12 | 100.65 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | 281.82 | 343.31 | 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement