Advertisement
KTH vs TURN
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KTH is a Hold and TURN is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
KTH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTURN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- KTH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- TURN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
KTH’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TURN’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- KTH’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
- TURN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
KTH (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а +0.23% price change this week, while TURN (@Investment Managers) price change was +0.87% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +4.62%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was +55.63%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.52%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Financial Conglomerates (+4.62% weekly)Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.
@Investment Managers (+0.96% weekly)Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.
| KTH | TURN | KTH / TURN | |
| Capitalization | N/A | 44.2M | - |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.341 | 20.381 | -7% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | N/A | 348K | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | 282K | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | 18K | - |
KTH | TURN | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 74 | 13 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 18 Undervalued | 69 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 93 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | 46 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 15 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 55 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
KTH's Valuation (18) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TURN (69). This means that KTH’s stock grew somewhat faster than TURN’s over the last 12 months.
KTH's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as TURN (100). This means that KTH’s stock grew similarly to TURN’s over the last 12 months.
TURN's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as KTH (100). This means that TURN’s stock grew similarly to KTH’s over the last 12 months.
TURN's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as KTH (56). This means that TURN’s stock grew similarly to KTH’s over the last 12 months.
TURN's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for KTH (100). This means that TURN’s stock grew significantly faster than KTH’s over the last 12 months.
| KTH | TURN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 64% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 25% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 17% | 5 days ago 48% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 21% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 14% | 2 days ago 46% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 14% | 2 days ago 54% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 22 days ago 13% | 2 days ago 46% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 9% | 4 days ago 55% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 8% | 2 days ago 59% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 19% | 2 days ago 53% |
Advertisement
KTH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that KTH and TURN have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KTH and TURN's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KTH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KTH | 100% | +0.04% | ||
| TURN - KTH | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.05% | ||
| EICA - KTH | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.09% | ||
| HNNA - KTH | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.28% | ||
| TRIN - KTH | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.96% | ||
| BCSF - KTH | 20% Poorly correlated | -1.38% | ||
More | ||||
TURN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TURN has been loosely correlated with FSK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TURN jumps, then FSK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TURN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TURN | 100% | -0.05% | ||
| FSK - TURN | 34% Loosely correlated | -0.85% | ||
| OCSL - TURN | 33% Loosely correlated | -0.88% | ||
| MFIC - TURN | 33% Loosely correlated | -1.23% | ||
| KBDC - TURN | 33% Poorly correlated | -1.96% | ||
| BBDC - TURN | 33% Poorly correlated | -1.35% | ||
More | ||||