KTHAF
Price
$0.60
Change
-$0.02 (-3.23%)
Updated
Nov 1 closing price
Capitalization
6.53B
SHG
Price
$36.20
Change
+$0.18 (+0.50%)
Updated
May 9 closing price
Capitalization
17.17B
76 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

KTHAF vs SHG

Header iconKTHAF vs SHG Comparison
Open Charts KTHAF vs SHGBanner chart's image
Krung Thai Bank Public
Price$0.60
Change-$0.02 (-3.23%)
Volume$2.22K
Capitalization6.53B
Shinhan Financial Group
Price$36.20
Change+$0.18 (+0.50%)
Volume$95.46K
Capitalization17.17B
KTHAF vs SHG Comparison Chart
Loading...
SHG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KTHAF vs. SHG commentary
May 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KTHAF is a Hold and SHG is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 11, 2025
Stock price -- (KTHAF: $0.60 vs. SHG: $36.20)
Brand notoriety: KTHAF and SHG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KTHAF: 100% vs. SHG: 40%
Market capitalization -- KTHAF: $6.53B vs. SHG: $17.17B
KTHAF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $6.53B. SHG’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $17.17B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KTHAF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSHG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • KTHAF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • SHG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both KTHAF and SHG are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SHG’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SHG’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

KTHAF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SHG (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.34% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.22%.

Reported Earning Dates

SHG is expected to report earnings on Jul 25, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.64% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHG($17.2B) has a higher market cap than KTHAF($6.53B). KTHAF has higher P/E ratio than SHG: KTHAF (6.98) vs SHG (5.96). SHG YTD gains are higher at: 10.097 vs. KTHAF (0.000). SHG has higher revenues than KTHAF: SHG (24.8T) vs KTHAF (148B).
KTHAFSHGKTHAF / SHG
Capitalization6.53B17.2B38%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD0.00010.097-
P/E Ratio6.985.96117%
Revenue148B24.8T1%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt418BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KTHAF vs SHG: Fundamental Ratings
KTHAF
SHG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4316
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
18
Undervalued
44
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
31
SMR RATING
1..100
11
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5045
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4044
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KTHAF's Valuation (18) in the null industry is in the same range as SHG (44) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that KTHAF’s stock grew similarly to SHG’s over the last 12 months.

SHG's Profit vs Risk Rating (1) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as KTHAF (3) in the null industry. This means that SHG’s stock grew similarly to KTHAF’s over the last 12 months.

SHG's SMR Rating (1) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as KTHAF (1) in the null industry. This means that SHG’s stock grew similarly to KTHAF’s over the last 12 months.

SHG's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as KTHAF (50) in the null industry. This means that SHG’s stock grew similarly to KTHAF’s over the last 12 months.

KTHAF's P/E Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as SHG (44) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that KTHAF’s stock grew similarly to SHG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SHG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
SHG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CHSCP27.10-0.08
-0.29%
CHS
CHRW88.97-0.61
-0.68%
C.H. Robinson Worldwide
GALT1.38-0.02
-1.43%
Galectin Therapeutics
PLUS63.85-1.61
-2.46%
ePlus
ESPR0.80-0.09
-10.60%
Esperion Therapeutics

KTHAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KTHAF and NUBC have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KTHAF and NUBC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KTHAF
1D Price
Change %
KTHAF100%
N/A
NUBC - KTHAF
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.59%
FSRL - KTHAF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ALBKF - KTHAF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SHG - KTHAF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.50%
KSBI - KTHAF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SHG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SHG has been closely correlated with KB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SHG jumps, then KB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SHG
1D Price
Change %
SHG100%
+0.50%
KB - SHG
80%
Closely correlated
-0.27%
WF - SHG
77%
Closely correlated
-0.29%
SBNY - SHG
47%
Loosely correlated
-4.41%
NWG - SHG
45%
Loosely correlated
+1.69%
COLB - SHG
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.50%
More