Advertisement
KVUE vs PG
KVUE vs PG Stock Comparison: Earnings Recap Beat vs Steady Results
Key Takeaways
- Kenvue (KVUE) reported Q4 2025 net sales of $3.78 billion, up 3.2% year-over-year, with adjusted diluted EPS of $0.27 beating estimates of $0.22.
- Full-year 2025 net sales for KVUE declined 2.1% to $15.12 billion, with adjusted diluted EPS at $1.08.
- Procter & Gamble (PG) posted Q2 FY2026 net sales of $22.2 billion, up 1%, with organic sales flat and core EPS steady at $1.88.
- PG maintained FY2026 guidance for organic sales growth of 0-4% and core EPS growth of 0-4%.
- KVUE offers a higher dividend yield around 4.4% versus PG's 2.6%, amid a pending acquisition by Kimberly-Clark expected in H2 2026.
- PG demonstrates superior scale with ~$84 billion annual revenue and market cap over $360 billion, compared to KVUE's ~$35 billion market cap.
Earnings Context and Why This Comparison Matters
Kenvue and Procter & Gamble operate in the consumer staples sector, with KVUE focusing on consumer health brands like Tylenol and Neutrogena, while PG spans household essentials, beauty, and grooming with icons like Tide and Pampers. Recent earnings highlight KVUE's quarterly resilience amid full-year volume pressures, contrasted with PG's consistent but flat performance. This comparison matters as both face shifting consumer demands, supply chain dynamics, and competitive pricing, influencing investor views on stability versus growth potential in defensive portfolios.
Kenvue Focus
Kenvue released its Q4 and full-year 2025 results on February 17, 2026, showcasing a strong quarter. Net sales rose 3.2% to $3.78 billion, with organic growth of 1.2% driven by 2.3% higher pricing offsetting a 1.1% volume dip. Adjusted diluted EPS climbed to $0.27 from $0.26 year-over-year, surpassing expectations, while reported diluted EPS was $0.17. Segment highlights included Essential Health up 6.1% and Skin Health and Beauty up 2.9%.
Full-year net sales fell 2.1% to $15.12 billion on 2.2% organic decline, primarily from 2.3% lower volumes. Adjusted diluted EPS was $1.08, down slightly from $1.14, with no forward guidance due to the pending Kimberly-Clark acquisition set for H2 2026 close.
Procter & Gamble Context
Procter & Gamble reported Q2 FY2026 results on January 22, 2026, with net sales up 1% to $22.2 billion and organic sales flat. Pricing gained 1%, offset by 1% volume decline. Core EPS held at $1.88, aligning with prior year, while diluted EPS dipped 5% to $1.78 due to restructuring. Beauty and Health Care segments grew organically 4% and 3%, respectively, though Baby, Feminine & Family Care fell 4%.
PG reaffirmed FY2026 outlook: organic sales 0-4%, core EPS growth 0-4% from $6.83 base. With trailing EPS around $6.75 and robust cash flow, PG prioritizes dividends (~$10 billion) and repurchases (~$5 billion).
Head-to-Head Earnings and Market Comparison
KVUE's Q4 beat reflects tactical pricing strength but underscores annual volume challenges in a transitional phase pre-acquisition, contrasting PG's scale-driven stability. PG's larger revenue base (~5x KVUE) and diversified portfolio buffer risks, with P/E around 23 versus KVUE's 25. Growth drivers favor PG's international momentum, while KVUE's higher dividend yield (4.4% vs. 2.6%) appeals amid merger uncertainty. Risks include KVUE's regulatory hurdles and PG's U.S. softness, with sentiment leaning toward PG's proven earnings quality.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform’s top-performing AI trading bots under prevailing market conditions. Tickeron provides hundreds of AI-powered bots scanning thousands of tickers across diverse strategies like trend-following, mean reversion, and momentum plays, with timeframes from intraday to long-term. The curated section highlights only the strongest recent performers, often displaying win rates above 60%, average returns of 10-30% on featured signals, and real-time adaptability to volatility. These bots employ machine learning for pattern recognition and backtested signals, aiding traders in identifying opportunities in stocks like KVUE and PG. Explore the Trending AI Robots page to evaluate performance metrics and deploy bots suited to current trends.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron AI favors PG with 65% probability over the next 6-12 months, citing superior earnings stability, trend resilience, and cash generation amid KVUE's acquisition overhang despite its recent beat and yield edge.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KVUE is a Hold and PG is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
KVUE’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- KVUE’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- PG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
KVUE’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PG’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- KVUE’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
- PG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
KVUE (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а -1.56% price change this week, while PG (@Household/Personal Care) price change was -3.31% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was -3.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.91%.
Reported Earning Dates
KVUE is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2026.
PG is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Household/Personal Care (-3.22% weekly)Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.
| KVUE | PG | KVUE / PG | |
| Capitalization | 32.9B | 330B | 10% |
| EBITDA | 3.21B | 24.9B | 13% |
| Gain YTD | 1.531 | 0.236 | 649% |
| P/E Ratio | 20.37 | 20.70 | 98% |
| Revenue | 15.3B | 86.7B | 18% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 12.3B | - |
| Total Debt | 8.67B | 37B | 23% |
PG | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 31 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 39 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 65 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 32 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 71 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 65 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| KVUE | PG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 55% | 3 days ago 50% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 60% | 3 days ago 46% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% | 3 days ago 47% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 44% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 46% | 3 days ago 42% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 54% | 12 days ago 45% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 65% | 27 days ago 42% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 52% | 3 days ago 46% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 39% | 3 days ago 21% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| ISTB | 48.13 | -0.11 | -0.23% |
| iShares Core 1-5 Year USD Bond ETF | |||
| UNX | 44.20 | -0.13 | -0.30% |
| Tradr 2X Long U Daily ETF | |||
| IBND | 31.24 | -0.19 | -0.60% |
| State Street® SPDR® Blmbg Intl CorpBdETF | |||
| MMLG | 35.98 | -0.51 | -1.41% |
| First Trust Multi-Manager Large Gr ETF | |||
| MTYY | 4.40 | -0.07 | -1.56% |
| GraniteShares YieldBoost MSTR ETF | |||
KVUE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KVUE has been loosely correlated with KMB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KVUE jumps, then KMB could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KVUE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KVUE | 100% | -0.47% | ||
| KMB - KVUE | 39% Loosely correlated | -0.79% | ||
| CL - KVUE | 30% Poorly correlated | -0.80% | ||
| UL - KVUE | 30% Poorly correlated | -0.98% | ||
| PG - KVUE | 28% Poorly correlated | -0.80% | ||
| CHD - KVUE | 27% Poorly correlated | -0.31% | ||
More | ||||