KWEB
Price
$26.66
Change
-$0.03 (-0.11%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Net Assets
5.3B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MAGC
Price
$20.02
Change
-$0.01 (-0.05%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Net Assets
14.23M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

KWEB vs MAGC

KWEB vs MAGC Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 22, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) vs. Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGC)

Key Takeaways

  • KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) tracks a broad passive index of China-based internet and internet-related companies with approximately 34 holdings, while Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGC) is an actively managed fund providing equal-weighted exposure to seven leading Chinese technology firms.
  • KWEB offers diversified sector exposure across consumer discretionary, communication services, and information technology within the Chinese internet ecosystem, whereas MAGC concentrates risk in a concentrated basket of seven names including Tencent Holdings Ltd, PDD Holdings Inc, and Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
  • Expense ratios stand at 0.70% for KWEB and 0.59% for MAGC, reflecting the cost of passive indexing versus active management and derivatives usage in the latter.
  • Both ETFs target China’s technology and internet sectors but differ in approach: KWEB emphasizes broad market-cap-weighted representation of internet-focused companies listed primarily on Hong Kong, NASDAQ, and NYSE exchanges, while MAGC employs equal weighting and may use swap agreements for exposure.
  • Structural differences include KWEB’s passive replication of the CSI Overseas China Internet Index versus MAGC’s active strategy, which introduces potential manager discretion alongside higher concentration risk.
  • Liquidity profiles favor KWEB due to its larger scale and longer track record since 2013, compared to MAGC’s more recent launch in October 2024.

Introduction

Investors seeking targeted exposure to China’s rapidly evolving technology and internet landscape often evaluate specialized exchange-traded funds. KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) and Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGC) both focus on Chinese companies driving digital innovation, e-commerce, and artificial intelligence development. They do not compete directly as identical products; instead, they represent alternative strategies within the same thematic sector. KWEB delivers broad, passive access to the China internet universe, while MAGC provides concentrated, equal-weighted exposure to seven flagship names. This comparison highlights structural distinctions, risk-return profiles, and positioning amid ongoing sector developments in regulatory policy and economic recovery.

KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) Overview

KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) is a passively managed fund that seeks to track the performance of the CSI Overseas China Internet Index. The index comprises China-based companies whose primary businesses focus on the internet and internet-related technology sectors, with securities listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange, NASDAQ, or NYSE. As of recent data, the fund holds approximately 34 securities and employs free-float market-capitalization weighting. Top holdings typically include Tencent Holdings Ltd, PDD Holdings Inc, Alibaba Group Holding Ltd, NetEase Inc, and Meituan, spanning communication services and consumer discretionary sectors. The expense ratio is 0.70%. Launched in 2013, KWEB features annual distribution frequency and provides diversified exposure to China’s digital economy without leverage or inverse strategies.

Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGC) Overview

Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGC) is an actively managed exchange-traded fund launched in October 2024 that seeks equal-weighted exposure to seven of the largest and most innovative Chinese technology companies, collectively referred to as the China Magnificent Seven. The portfolio includes Tencent Holdings Ltd, PDD Holdings Inc, Alibaba Group Holding Ltd, Meituan, BYD Co Ltd, Xiaomi Corp, and NetEase Inc. The fund may achieve exposure through American Depositary Receipts or derivative instruments such as swaps. It maintains an expense ratio of 0.59% and follows an active management approach rather than tracking a traditional index. Holdings are rebalanced to maintain equal weights, introducing concentration risk relative to broader market-cap strategies.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both ETFs operate within China’s technology and internet sectors, which encompass e-commerce, digital services, artificial intelligence, and consumer electronics. Key macro drivers include domestic consumption trends, policy emphasis on technological self-reliance, and evolving regulatory frameworks affecting data privacy and platform competition. Capital flows into Chinese equities have fluctuated with economic indicators and geopolitical developments. Sector risks encompass regulatory uncertainty, competition from global peers, and sensitivity to interest rate expectations in major economies. Recent market cycles have highlighted resilience in leading digital platforms alongside opportunities in artificial intelligence applications across consumer and enterprise segments.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent weeks and months, performance dynamics between the two ETFs have reflected differences in diversification and weighting methodologies. KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) has shown sensitivity to broad sector rotation within Chinese internet stocks, influenced by earnings cycles of major holdings and shifts in investor sentiment toward emerging market growth. Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGC), with its equal-weighted and concentrated structure, may exhibit amplified volatility during periods of uneven performance among its seven constituents. Relative positioning favors KWEB for investors seeking broader representation across the China internet theme, while MAGC appeals to those targeting concentrated bets on flagship innovators. Both have responded to macroeconomic factors such as commodity trends and global interest rate expectations through their underlying equity exposures.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors evaluating ETFs such as KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) and Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGC) may find the platform useful for uncovering additional opportunities aligned with their criteria.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probability of favor to KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) for investors prioritizing diversification and established liquidity within the China internet theme. Its passive index-tracking methodology, broader holdings base, and longer operational history provide a more balanced risk profile compared to the concentrated active approach of Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGC). Cost efficiency and sector momentum considerations further support this relative positioning in probabilistic assessments, though individual investor objectives should guide final decisions.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
KWEB vs. MAGC commentary
Aug 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KWEB is a Hold and MAGC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KWEB has more net assets: 5.3B vs. MAGC (14.2M). MAGC has a higher annual dividend yield than KWEB: MAGC (-15.825) vs KWEB (-21.703). KWEB was incepted earlier than MAGC: KWEB (13 years) vs MAGC (2 years). MAGC (0.60) has a lower expense ratio than KWEB (0.70). MAGC has a higher turnover KWEB (45.00) vs KWEB (45.00).
KWEBMAGCKWEB / MAGC
Gain YTD-21.703-15.825137%
Net Assets5.3B14.2M37,331%
Total Expense Ratio0.700.60117%
Turnover45.00116.0039%
Yield7.434.71158%
Fund Existence13 years2 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KWEBMAGC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 26 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
KWEB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MAGC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
URNJ26.101.92
+7.94%
Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF
ETG23.990.11
+0.46%
Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Global Dividend Income Fund
MARM34.430.03
+0.09%
FT Vest U.S. Eq Max Buffr ETF - Mar
AIPO31.23N/A
N/A
Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF
UCIB37.07-0.09
-0.25%
UBS ETRACS BgCstMtCdy(CMCI)TtlRetETNSerB

KWEB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KWEB has been closely correlated with BABA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KWEB jumps, then BABA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KWEB
1D Price
Change %
KWEB100%
-0.11%
BABA - KWEB
89%
Closely correlated
-8.57%
JD - KWEB
83%
Closely correlated
-0.14%
BILI - KWEB
82%
Closely correlated
+2.40%
BIDU - KWEB
80%
Closely correlated
+1.35%
KC - KWEB
79%
Closely correlated
-2.45%
More