KWEB
Price
$26.41
Change
+$0.16 (+0.61%)
Updated
Aug 25, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
5.3B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TDF
Price
$10.84
Change
+$0.03 (+0.28%)
Updated
Aug 25, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
321.76M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

KWEB vs TDF

KWEB vs TDF Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 22, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) vs. Templeton Dragon Fund, Inc. (TDF)

Key Takeaways

  • KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) is a passive exchange-traded fund tracking the CSI Overseas China Internet Index, concentrating on approximately 34 China-based internet and internet-related companies listed outside mainland China.
  • Templeton Dragon Fund, Inc. (TDF) is an actively managed closed-end fund focused on long-term capital appreciation through at least 45% allocation to China companies across a broader range of sectors, with around 58 holdings.
  • KWEB offers targeted exposure to the internet and consumer technology themes with a lower expense ratio of 0.70%, while TDF provides diversified China equity exposure at a higher expense ratio of approximately 1.21%.
  • Structural differences include KWEB's rules-based, market-cap-weighted indexing versus TDF's active stock selection and closed-end fund structure, which can lead to trading at discounts or premiums to net asset value.
  • Sector allocations in KWEB emphasize Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary, whereas TDF spans a wider array including Technology, Materials, and Financials.
  • Both vehicles target China growth opportunities but differ in risk profiles, with KWEB exhibiting higher concentration in internet leaders and TDF offering broader economic exposure.

Introduction

Investors seeking China equity exposure often evaluate specialized vehicles like KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) and Templeton Dragon Fund, Inc. (TDF). These two do not compete directly as interchangeable products. Instead, they represent distinct strategies: one delivers concentrated, passive access to the internet sector, while the other provides active, broader China market participation. The comparison helps investors align choices with specific objectives around thematic focus, cost, and management style amid evolving China-related market dynamics.

KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) Overview

KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) is a passively managed exchange-traded fund that seeks to track the performance of the CSI Overseas China Internet Index before fees and expenses. The index measures the equity performance of publicly traded China-based companies whose primary businesses are in the internet and internet-related sectors, listed on exchanges outside mainland China such as Hong Kong, NASDAQ, or NYSE. The fund typically holds around 34 securities. Top holdings commonly include Tencent Holdings Ltd, PDD Holdings Inc, Alibaba Group Holding Ltd, Meituan, and NetEase Inc, with heavy weighting toward Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary sectors. KWEB maintains an expense ratio of 0.70% and follows a free-float market-capitalization-weighted methodology with periodic rebalancing. Its structure emphasizes liquidity through exchange trading and focuses exclusively on the internet theme rather than broader China equities.

Templeton Dragon Fund, Inc. (TDF) Overview

Templeton Dragon Fund, Inc. (TDF) is an actively managed closed-end fund with an investment objective of long-term capital appreciation. It invests at least 45% of total assets in equity securities of China companies, defined to include those listed in mainland China, Hong Kong, Taiwan, or elsewhere that may benefit from Chinese economic developments. The fund typically holds approximately 58 issuers. Holdings often feature Tencent Holdings Ltd and Alibaba Group Holding Ltd alongside positions in technology hardware, materials, and banks. Sector exposure spans Communication Services, Consumer Discretionary, Technology, Materials, and Financials. TDF carries a net expense ratio of approximately 1.21% and employs active stock selection with quarterly distributions. As a closed-end fund, it trades on an exchange but can deviate from its net asset value, introducing premium or discount dynamics distinct from open-end structures.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both funds operate within the China equity market, influenced by domestic consumption trends, regulatory shifts in technology and internet sectors, and broader macroeconomic factors including interest rate expectations and geopolitical developments. The internet and consumer technology space faces catalysts such as e-commerce expansion and digital services growth, offset by regulatory oversight and competition. Broader China equities respond to policy support for economic recovery, supply-chain shifts, and global capital flows into emerging markets. Risks include sector-specific policy changes, currency fluctuations, and varying liquidity conditions across listings in Hong Kong and U.S. exchanges. These elements shape relative positioning between concentrated thematic exposure and diversified country allocation.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) has shown sensitivity to internet-sector earnings and sentiment around consumer digital adoption, often displaying higher volatility tied to top holdings' results. Templeton Dragon Fund, Inc. (TDF) has reflected broader China equity movements, incorporating contributions from materials and financials that can moderate or amplify swings depending on economic cycles. Relative positioning highlights KWEB's alignment with internet momentum versus TDF's exposure to multiple sectors, leading to differences in drawdown patterns and recovery trajectories during periods of sector rotation or macro shifts. Investors evaluating these characteristics consider how each vehicle's structure influences behavior across varying market environments.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors seeking data-driven insights into vehicles like KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) or Templeton Dragon Fund, Inc. (TDF) may benefit from exploring its capabilities.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probability of favor to KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) due to its lower expense ratio, targeted thematic consistency within the internet sector, and rules-based diversification profile that aligns with measurable sector momentum indicators. Templeton Dragon Fund, Inc. (TDF) presents strengths in broader exposure but carries higher costs and closed-end fund characteristics that introduce additional variables. This assessment reflects probabilistic evaluation of cost efficiency, concentration risk, and trend alignment rather than a recommendation for any investor.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
KWEB vs. TDF commentary
Aug 25, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KWEB is a Hold and TDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KWEB has more net assets: 5.3B vs. TDF (322M). TDF has a higher annual dividend yield than KWEB: TDF (-1.728) vs KWEB (-22.907). KWEB was incepted earlier than TDF: KWEB (13 years) vs TDF (32 years). KWEB (0.70) has a lower expense ratio than TDF (1.33). TDF has a higher turnover KWEB (45.00) vs KWEB (45.00).
KWEBTDFKWEB / TDF
Gain YTD-22.907-1.7281,326%
Net Assets5.3B322M1,646%
Total Expense Ratio0.701.3353%
Turnover45.0063.1071%
Yield7.430.83897%
Fund Existence13 years32 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KWEBTDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
KWEB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TDF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ETG24.030.04
+0.17%
Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Global Dividend Income Fund
HYBX29.65N/A
N/A
TCW High Yield Bond ETF
ICRC17.42N/A
N/A
Bitwise Crcl Option Income Strategy ETF
FPA48.43-0.35
-0.71%
First Trust AsiaPac ex-Jpn AlphaDEX® ETF
CAML40.10-0.37
-0.92%
Congress Large Cap Growth ETF

KWEB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KWEB has been closely correlated with BABA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KWEB jumps, then BABA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KWEB
1D Price
Change %
KWEB100%
-1.54%
BABA - KWEB
89%
Closely correlated
-0.73%
JD - KWEB
83%
Closely correlated
-0.58%
BILI - KWEB
82%
Closely correlated
-3.28%
BIDU - KWEB
80%
Closely correlated
-1.11%
KC - KWEB
79%
Closely correlated
-6.46%
More

TDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TDF and YUMC have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TDF and YUMC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TDF
1D Price
Change %
TDF100%
-1.28%
YUMC - TDF
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.21%
PDD - TDF
0%
Poorly correlated
-1.48%