It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
KWR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLYB’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
KWR’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LYB’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
KWR (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а +2.43% price change this week, while LYB (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was +0.55% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was +1.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.10%.
KWR is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2025.
LYB is expected to report earnings on Aug 01, 2025.
The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.
KWR | LYB | KWR / LYB | |
Capitalization | 3.65B | 33.1B | 11% |
EBITDA | 286M | 4.64B | 6% |
Gain YTD | -17.505 | -17.617 | 99% |
P/E Ratio | 32.39 | 15.75 | 206% |
Revenue | 1.95B | 41.1B | 5% |
Total Cash | 195M | 3.39B | 6% |
Total Debt | 789M | 13B | 6% |
KWR | LYB | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 4 | 69 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 49 Fair valued | 4 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 80 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 79 | 75 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | 63 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 72 | 18 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 5 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LYB's Valuation (4) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KWR (49). This means that LYB’s stock grew somewhat faster than KWR’s over the last 12 months.
LYB's Profit vs Risk Rating (80) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is in the same range as KWR (100). This means that LYB’s stock grew similarly to KWR’s over the last 12 months.
LYB's SMR Rating (75) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is in the same range as KWR (79). This means that LYB’s stock grew similarly to KWR’s over the last 12 months.
KWR's Price Growth Rating (62) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is in the same range as LYB (63). This means that KWR’s stock grew similarly to LYB’s over the last 12 months.
LYB's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KWR (72). This means that LYB’s stock grew somewhat faster than KWR’s over the last 12 months.
KWR | LYB | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago71% | 1 day ago67% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago67% | 1 day ago63% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago76% | 1 day ago55% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago64% | 1 day ago49% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago58% | 1 day ago62% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago57% | 1 day ago63% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago57% | 1 day ago60% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago72% | 6 days ago55% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago74% | 1 day ago56% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago50% | N/A |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
MFSG | 26.31 | 0.23 | +0.88% |
MFS Active Growth ETF | |||
ADX | 21.48 | 0.09 | +0.42% |
Adams Diversified Equity Fund | |||
LSAT | 39.50 | 0.13 | +0.33% |
LeaderShares® AlphaFctr® Tctcl Fcsd ETF | |||
PNOV | 39.46 | 0.11 | +0.28% |
Innovator US Equity Power Buffer ETF Nov | |||
DEHP | 27.93 | 0.02 | +0.08% |
Dimensional Em Mkts High Prof ETF |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KWR has been closely correlated with SCL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KWR jumps, then SCL could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KWR | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
KWR | 100% | -0.64% | ||
SCL - KWR | 77% Closely correlated | +0.27% | ||
AVNT - KWR | 72% Closely correlated | -0.64% | ||
IOSP - KWR | 70% Closely correlated | -0.11% | ||
OLN - KWR | 70% Closely correlated | +1.04% | ||
LYB - KWR | 67% Closely correlated | +0.46% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LYB has been closely correlated with DOW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LYB jumps, then DOW could also see price increases.