KWR
Price
$104.53
Change
+$4.63 (+4.63%)
Updated
May 8, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.65B
89 days until earnings call
USLM
Price
$99.25
Change
+$2.02 (+2.08%)
Updated
May 8, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.68B
83 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

KWR vs USLM

Header iconKWR vs USLM Comparison
Open Charts KWR vs USLMBanner chart's image
Quaker Houghton
Price$104.53
Change+$4.63 (+4.63%)
Volume$300
Capitalization3.65B
United States Lime & Minerals
Price$99.25
Change+$2.02 (+2.08%)
Volume$810
Capitalization1.68B
KWR vs USLM Comparison Chart
Loading...
KWR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
USLM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
KWR vs. USLM commentary
May 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is KWR is a Hold and USLM is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 09, 2025
Stock price -- (KWR: $99.90 vs. USLM: $97.23)
Brand notoriety: KWR and USLM are both not notable
KWR represents the Chemicals: Specialty, while USLM is part of the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KWR: 70% vs. USLM: 58%
Market capitalization -- KWR: $3.65B vs. USLM: $1.68B
KWR [@Chemicals: Specialty] is valued at $3.65B. USLM’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $1.68B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry ranges from $223.16B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $59.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry is $9.19B. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $8.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KWR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileUSLM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • KWR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • USLM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, USLM is a better buy in the long-term than KWR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KWR’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while USLM’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • KWR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • USLM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, USLM is a better buy in the short-term than KWR.

Price Growth

KWR (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а -5.70% price change this week, while USLM (@Construction Materials) price change was +3.98% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was +0.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.81%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was +0.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.37%.

Reported Earning Dates

KWR is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2025.

USLM is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Specialty (+0.54% weekly)

The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.

@Construction Materials (+0.33% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KWR($3.65B) has a higher market cap than USLM($1.68B). KWR has higher P/E ratio than USLM: KWR (32.39) vs USLM (22.59). USLM YTD gains are higher at: -26.708 vs. KWR (-28.431). KWR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 286M vs. USLM (109M). KWR (195M) and USLM (188M) have equal amount of cash in the bank . USLM has less debt than KWR: USLM (5.5M) vs KWR (789M). KWR has higher revenues than USLM: KWR (1.95B) vs USLM (281M).
KWRUSLMKWR / USLM
Capitalization3.65B1.68B217%
EBITDA286M109M262%
Gain YTD-28.431-26.708106%
P/E Ratio32.3922.59143%
Revenue1.95B281M695%
Total Cash195M188M104%
Total Debt789M5.5M14,343%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KWR vs USLM: Fundamental Ratings
KWR
USLM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
415
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
46
Fair valued
71
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10034
SMR RATING
1..100
7439
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8750
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8458
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KWR's Valuation (46) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is in the same range as USLM (71) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that KWR’s stock grew similarly to USLM’s over the last 12 months.

USLM's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the Construction Materials industry is significantly better than the same rating for KWR (100) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that USLM’s stock grew significantly faster than KWR’s over the last 12 months.

USLM's SMR Rating (39) in the Construction Materials industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KWR (74) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that USLM’s stock grew somewhat faster than KWR’s over the last 12 months.

USLM's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Construction Materials industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KWR (87) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that USLM’s stock grew somewhat faster than KWR’s over the last 12 months.

USLM's P/E Growth Rating (58) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as KWR (84) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that USLM’s stock grew similarly to KWR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KWRUSLM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
KWR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
USLM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GFACX61.600.20
+0.33%
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
LAMQX22.50N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Dividend Growth R2
HERAX10.46N/A
N/A
Hartford Emerging Markets Equity A
MDMIX24.78N/A
N/A
Madison Dividend Income I
VWYKX37.13N/A
N/A
Voya Small Cap Growth W

USLM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, USLM has been loosely correlated with EXP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if USLM jumps, then EXP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To USLM
1D Price
Change %
USLM100%
-1.33%
EXP - USLM
61%
Loosely correlated
-2.38%
KNF - USLM
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.07%
VMC - USLM
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.52%
BCC - USLM
54%
Loosely correlated
-0.43%
SUM - USLM
49%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More